9/7/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F, determined as part of the site plan approval process that both the Dodgers and de Guardiola will be going through with the City of Vero Beach. Administrator Chandler advised that the proposed resolution under item "C" is the standard resolution used by the County for bond issues. Item "D" is for information only as it is an agreement between the Dodgers and de Guardiola. Chairman Adams called for questions from the Commissioners. She questioned the second sentence of Section 210.03(b) (page 182 of backup) of the proposed ordinance because it referenced the "beach issue". Deputy County Attorney William Collins explained that the modifications were merely to clarify the existing ordinance so there is no confusion that the revenues derived from the 4'h cent are not to be allocated to the beaches. In response to Chairman Adams' next question, Special Counsel Reid advised that the number of days in the various agreements refers to numerical days unless specified as business days. Vice Chairman Ginn was concerned about the survey, and Special Counsel Reid advised that the survey is in process and is required as part of the title work to be done. He anticipated its completion within the next 30 days. Mr. Reid stated that the closing date of March 31, 2001, is a "target" date. Administrator Chandler added that the legal descriptions in the documents are based on the old survey; and should there be any changes on the updated survey, they will be resolved later in conjunction with the title work. In response to Vice Chairman Ginn's inquiry about the difference between "right of first refusal" and "first right of refusal", Mr. Reid explained the terms and what they meant on the pages she mentioned. (Pages 199 and 214 of the backup) Commissioner Macht referred to a letter from Malcolm Liggett, and Administrator September 7, 2000 0 4 0 I