Laserfiche WebLink
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - WESTGATE COLONY SEWER <br />ASSESSMENT - RESOLUTION III (NOT ADOPTED) <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING <br />IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />Assistant Utilities Department Director Jeff Smith reviewed Memoranda of October <br />27 and November 6, 2000. <br />DATE: OCTOBER 27, 2000 <br />TO: JAMES &CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P. . <br />_;�DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S S <br />PREPARED JAS D.CHAST <br />ME <br />AND STAFFED MANAGER OF SE MENT PROJECTS <br />BY: DEPARTMENT UTILITY SERVICES <br />WESTGATE COLONY SUBDIVISION PETITION SEWER <br />SERVICE (79TH& 80TH AVENUES, 79THCOURT& 21ST <br />STREET, NORTH OF STATE ROAD 60) <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US -98 -19 -CS <br />RESOLUTION M PUBLIC HEARING <br />BACKGROUND <br />On October 17, 2000, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners <br />approved Resolution I (2000-129) and Resolution II (2000-130). Resolution I, contained <br />the preliminary assessment roll describing the project and cost. Resolution H set the date <br />of the public hearing for the subject project. Property owners have been notified of the <br />public hearing by mail. Resolution I (2000-129) was published in the Vero Beach Press <br />Journal on October 23, 2000. (See Agenda Item and implementation of the Oct. 17, 2000 <br />meeting Attachment 1). <br />ANALYSIS <br />Design of the sewer collection system is complete. An informational meeting was held <br />for the benefit of the property owners on October 25, 2000. <br />The Westgate Colony subdivision consists of 79 lots (72 parcel ID's). Eight of the <br />property Owners own 1.5 to 2 platted lots. There are 18 non owner occupied homes <br />(many are rentals), and there are five vacant lots. The 44 signatures on the petition <br />represents ownership of 47 lots, which is 69% of the subdivision's 68 homes (591/6 of the <br />79 lots and 61% of the total square footage to be assessed). <br />The copy of the petitioner's letter dated March 23,(Attachment 2) 1998 explains several <br />concerns, among which are: <br />November 7, 2000 <br />65 <br />9K 1 15 PG 772 <br />