Laserfiche WebLink
1. Human Services <br /> None <br /> 2. Sandridge Golf Club <br /> None <br /> 3, Recreation <br /> None <br /> D. Human Resources <br /> None <br /> E. Office of Management and Budget <br /> None <br /> F. Public Works <br /> 10:53 1. Department of the Army Feasibility Cost Share Agreement Sector 5 — <br /> a.m. Federal Shore Protection Project <br /> (memorandum dated May 27, 2015) 197-223 <br /> Coastal Engineer James Gray provided a brief history of the Sector 5 <br /> Beach Project; he reported that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br /> (USACE) currently had a backlog of shoreline protection projects <br /> and was considering removing the Sector 5 Beach Project for a <br /> Feasibility Study or removal from their list. He revealed that the <br /> study would be in the form of a General Reevaluation Report (GRR) <br /> that would cost about $3,000,000. He presented two alternatives for <br /> the Board to consider: (1) abandon the Feasibility Cost Share <br /> Agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), or (2) <br /> execute the Feasibility Cost Share Agreement with USACE and <br /> proceed forward with the General Reevaluation Report Study. He <br /> said staff and the Beach and Shores Advisory Committee <br /> recommended abandoning the Feasibility Cost Share Agreement with <br /> USACE. <br /> MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner O'Bryan, SECONDED by <br /> Vice Chairman Solari, to abandon the Feasibility Cost Share <br /> Agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). <br /> Commissioner O'Bryan believed there was a lot of sand that would <br /> eventually work its way south and provide benefit to Sector 5. He felt <br /> the cost and impact to the hard bottom was unacceptable. <br /> Board of County Commission Minutes <br /> June 2,2015 Page 10 <br />