My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/16/2014 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
12/16/2014 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 3:57:56 PM
Creation date
5/26/2016 1:45:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s <br />• <br />Mediator Alvarez felt it would be beneficial to have more analysis on the issue, so all <br />parties could base their decision on the best data possible. He suggested having a six-month <br />cooling off period to analyze the situation and review the options. <br />Mediator Alvarez reviewed some potential solutions: <br />• <br />• <br />The settlement terms in the Town's Proposal <br />One or more of the following actions: <br />a. Some type of independent/representative electric authority <br />b. Reduction of general fund contribution from electric utility revenues <br />c. Amendments of OUC and/or FMPA obligations <br />d. Other rate reduction initiatives through the rate reduction study <br />e. Outside determination of reasonable rates <br />f. FPL purchase <br />g. Expert on the issue retained by all parties <br />Mediator Alvarez said it would be to the benefit of all parties, that further efforts be done <br />over the next six months, and recommended continuing talks with OUC and FMPA with the <br />Town and County parties to such talks to understand the difficulties and legal ramifications of <br />the negotiations. <br />Attorney May clarified the Town envisioned that during the six month cooling off period, <br />they would be able to conduct evaluations, which may include a potential RFP from providers of <br />electricity. <br />The mediator announced a recess for discussions at 1:57 p.m. and resumed at 2:02 p.m., <br />with all parties present. <br />Attorney Wright stated the City agreed to the six-month cooling off period, but would not <br />agree to the document proposed by the Town. He added the Town could do anything they want <br />in terms of conducting a RFP to evaluate its position and alternatives going forward. He <br />indicated the City would continue negotiations with OUC, proceed with the rate study and the <br />system optimization/efficiency study. The City supported having the Town and the County <br />representatives at the OUC, FMPA and FPL meetings as long as those entities agreed. <br />Attorney May said what was missing from Attorney Wright's comments was the core <br />issue for the Town to exercise its right to provide electricity to its citizens, whether it was <br />provided i by the Town, or by another provider. <br />Attorney May referred to Florida Statutes Section 180.02, Powers of Municipalities - <br />Any municipality may extend and execute all of its corporate powers applicable for the <br />accomplishment of the purposes of this chapter outside of its corporate limits...provided, <br />however, !that said corporate powers shall not extend or apply within the corporate limits of <br />another municipality. He indicated that the Town needed to be in a position that when the <br />franchise agreement expires, there was an agreement with the City that there would be no <br />Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County <br />Electric Utilities Mediation <br />December 17, 2014 <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.