Laserfiche WebLink
Detailed Audit Approach - Single Audit in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 <br />Each audit engagement is unique and requires different procedures to meet the specific circumstances. <br />However, the following broad approach is followed for most of our Single Audits. These procedures are <br />generally performed concurrently with the financial statement audit and the reports are issued on the <br />same date. However, this work can be performed at a separate time if requested by management. The <br />following procedures describe our general approach in performing a single audit: <br />Testing of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance and <br />Understanding Internal Controls - Our first step in performing a single audit is obtaining a complete <br />schedule of expenditures of federal awards and state financial assistance from management. While <br />the auditors may assist in the compiling and formatting the schedule, the responsibility of identifying <br />Federal awards and providing information on the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) and <br />Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CSFA) numbers, grant/pass-through award number, pass- <br />through agencies, and current year expenditures is the responsibility of management. We will request <br />that a complete schedule be provided before commencement of the single audit procedures. <br />Effective Use of Technology and Auditing Software <br />We recognize that in order to provide maximum value to our clients, audit efficiency is of utmost <br />importance. We are nationally recognized for innovative use of technology in the audit process and have <br />developed a proprietary system for preparing financial statements and workpapers to maximize the <br />benefits of technology. In fact, your concurring principal, Stephen Blann, has served in various roles <br />within the Firm related to technology services, including Technology Champion, Governmental <br />Accounting and Assurance Group; Member of the hiformation Technology Steering Committee and <br />Technology Utilization Committee; and firm trainer. He is an expert in electronic data extraction and <br />analysis, as well as custom application programming. In addition, Rehmann has established an <br />Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM") division dedicated to internal controls and security in the EDP <br />area. <br />We use technology every day to improve profitability, efficiency, and the level of service provided for our <br />clients. We continuously invest in technology purchases, implementation, and the training of all <br />employees. Our clients benefit from the efficiencies gained in the audit process through the use of this <br />technology. <br />Determine Major Programs and Perform Controls/Compliance Testing — A single audit involves detail <br />testing of individual programs (or clusters of programs) which are selected by the auditors using various <br />criterion. Some of the factors are subjective and others have very little flexibility. For example, programs <br />of a certain size must be tested at least every third year. The audit team will select major programs based <br />on the criteria listed in OMB Circular A-133 and their risk assessment process. Programs/clusters selected <br />as major will be communicated to management as soon as they are determined and a detailed request list <br />will be provided. <br />Report preparation and audit finalization — After all the detail testing is completed and related inquiries <br />have been made, the auditors will identify whether any noncompliance or control deficiencies were <br />noted. These instances will be evaluated for magnitude and materiality and an initial determination of <br />method of communication will be made. <br />