Laserfiche WebLink
In opposing the County's proposal to reduce leave accruals and payouts, Local <br />2201 did not attempt to argue at the Special Magistrate hearing that its <br />implementation would result in bargaining unit employees having an insufficient <br />amount of leave. Nor could Local 2201 make such an argument as, under the <br />County's medical leave, annual leave and shift exchange proposals, current <br />bargaining unit employees would still have between 2.5 and 5 months of medical <br />leave, up to 2 months of annual leave, 3 paid Kelly days, 1 paid personal day (day <br />shift), and at least 1 month of shift exchanges, for a total of between 6 and 8.5 <br />months of potential time off each year. Newly hired bargaining unit employees <br />would have up to 1.5 months of medical leave, up to 1.5 months of annual leave, <br />3 paid Kelly days, 1 paid personal day (day shift), and at least 1 month of shift <br />exchanges, for a total of 4.5 months of potential time off each year. This is <br />clearly a sufficient amount of time off each year. And if that were not enough, <br />unlike most employers, the County allows Local 2201 bargaining unit employees <br />to begin their 3 months (12 weeks) of Family Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"), after <br />they have used all their paid leave, and to receive sick leave donations while on <br />FMLA leave, thus giving Local 2201 bargaining unit employees up to an <br />additional 3 months of leave for illness and injuries that are not duty related (duty - <br />related injuries are covered by workers' compensation). <br />Turning to ¶26.01, a doctor's note is currently required after 3 medical leave <br />occurrences in 90 days to ensure that medical leave is not being abused. While <br />not spelled out in the CBA, a practice has developed whereby multiple <br />consecutive shifts of medical leave are counted as one occurrence. Following <br />this, an employee can call in sick for 10 consecutive shifts, and thereby be out an <br />entire month, but the employee is charged with only 1 occurrence. This is clearly <br />contrary to the spirit and intent embodied by ¶26.01. Moreover, the uncontrolled <br />use of sick leave is problematic as the Division invariably has to pay employees <br />overtime to cover medical leave vacancies, which is causing the Division to <br />exceed its overtime budget. In this regard, overtime expenditures are already <br />$161,000 (65.9%) higher in the first quarter of the current fiscal year than they <br />were the same time last fiscal year. The County, therefore, has proposed to count <br />each full or partial absence as an occurrence for purposes of requiring that the <br />employee submit a doctor's note. <br />Regarding the current ¶26.03, the current Article provides that additional medical <br />leave may be granted to bargaining unit employees by the Emergency Services <br />Director. This provision is outdated as the Emergency Services Director does not <br />determine medical leave. That is a function of County Human Resources in <br />accordance with County policy. As such, the County seeks to delete this outdated <br />language. <br />As to the newly numbered ¶26.05.B, some employees are calling in sick the day <br />they are supposed to return from annual leave; essentially using medical leave to <br />extend their vacations. This is causing the Division overtime. To address this <br />issue, the County has proposed that an employee who calls in sick in conjunction <br />17 <br />17 <br />