Laserfiche WebLink
Original Message <br />Exhibit B <br />From: Mandel, Jeffrey <jmandel@laborlawyers.com<mailto:jmandel@laborlawyers.com » <br />To: jpp111934<jpp111934@aol.com<mailto:jpp111934@aol.com» <br />Cc: Matthew Mierzwa <jgibson@mierzwalaw.com<mailto:jgibson@mierzwalaw.com » <br />Sent: Wed, Dec 24, 2014 3:32 pm <br />Subject: Indian River County and Local 2201 <br />Mr. Popular, <br />Thank you for forwarding us your Recommendations in this matter. So that the <br />parties can fairly consider them, I have a couple of requests for clarification. <br />First, on p.6, in the Article 18 discussion, you have a recommendation relating <br />to Article 18.03. As you may recall, both parties had a new proposed Article <br />18.02, and both had renumbered the existing Article 18.02, which starts with <br />"The Promotion Board shall be composed of...," as the new Article 18.03. Are you <br />recommending that the new language be added to the existing 18.02/newly numbered <br />18.03? Secondly, with respect to that recommendation, it appears that you are <br />adopting language taken from the last sentence of the Employer's proposed newly <br />numbered 18.03, which begins, "The Emergency Services Director or his <br />designee...." Are you recommending the adoption of that whole proposed sentence <br />with the exclusion of "per diem employees" and "hiring from the outside," or <br />just the phrase "Sole discretion to appoint a qualified employee who is not on <br />the promotional list"? If it is the latter, I am trying to figure out where <br />that phrase would go. <br />Second, on p.7, in your recommendation regarding Article 26, you have a <br />recommendation as to Article 26.06 "Charging Leave," including paragraphs A, B, <br />and C. In the next line, you have another recommendation for Article 26.06 B <br />and C. Is there a typo in the recommendation, and if so, how should it read? <br />Also, there is no recommendation as to the Employers proposed new Article 26.07, <br />which is the same as the Union's proposed Article 26.07 C. Was that <br />intentional? <br />I know that all of the proposed renumbering has complicated matters in this <br />case, and I thank you in advance for clarifying the foregoing. <br />Happy Holidays, <br />Jeff. <br />Jeffrey E. Mandel <br />Attorney at Law <br />jmandel@laborlawyers.com<mailto:jmandel@laborlawyers.com> I 0: (407) 541-0850 <br />F: (407) 541-0887 <br />200 South Orange Avenue I Suite 1100 I Orlando, FL 32801 <br />[Fisher & Phillips LLP] <br />vCard<http://www.laborlawyers.com/getvcard.aspx?id=9857> <br />Bio<http://www.laborlawyers.com/jmandel> I Website<http://www.laborlawyers.com> <br />Representing employers nationally in labor and employment matters <br />Atlanta I Baltimore I Boston I Charlotte I Chicago I Cleveland ( Columbia <br />Columbus I Dallas I Denver I Fort Lauderdale I Gulfport <br />Houston I Irvine I Kansas City I Las Vegas I Los Angeles I Louisville I Memphis <br />3 <br />38 <br />