My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/05/2015 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
05/05/2015 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2015 3:33:53 PM
Creation date
8/6/2015 2:11:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
05/05/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
410
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Davis sought and received details on how to differentiate between <br /> legitimate and non-legitimate rental businesses. <br /> Commissioner Flescher clarified that legitimate short-term rental businesses are licensed, <br /> inspected by the County Health Department,and lodging taxes are collected when the dwellings <br /> are rented(7% for State,4% for County). <br /> Community Development Director Bob Keating affirmed for Vice Chairman O'Bryan <br /> that Code Enforcement could/would address complaints regarding bad behavior at short-term <br /> rentals. <br /> Chairman Wheeler expressed that those living in gated communities should address <br /> concerns and issues through their Property Owners' Association. He did not want to pass an <br /> ordinance that would prevent short-term vacation rentals Countywide. <br /> Director Boling, in response to Commissioner Davis, disclosed that the existing <br /> definition is unclear, and staff's interpretation of the County Ordinance is that to rent for less <br /> than 30 days constitutes a hotel/motel usage. <br /> Director Keating confirmed that the current code is enforceable, but believed it would be <br /> best to clarify,not change it. <br /> Attorney Polackwich explained why the ordinance is unclear, and why staff reached its <br /> conclusion by implication,rather than by a direct sentence in the definition stating that any <br /> structure offering a combination of rooms for rent or lease for longer than one month at a time, <br /> shall not be considered a hotel or motel. He made it clear that the definition does not expressly <br /> address the question of what happens if a property is rented for less than a month; therefore,staff <br /> interpreted the provision to mean that if a house is rented for less than one month, it is regarded <br /> as a hotel/motel. <br /> July 10,2012 <br /> Special Call Meeting 4 <br /> ATTACHMENT 2 211 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.