My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-144
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2015
>
2015-144
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 2:33:58 PM
Creation date
8/10/2015 1:08:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
07/14/2015
Control Number
2015-144
Agenda Item Number
8.M.
Entity Name
Dickerson Florida
Subject
Asphalt Millings
Area
Vero Lake Estates
Project Number
1317
Bid Number
2015039
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
therein, all of which must be satisfactory to <br />OWNER. <br />2. Beginning with the second <br />Application for Payment, each Application shall <br />include an affidavit of CONTRACTOR stating <br />that all previous progress payments received <br />on account of the Work have been applied on <br />account to discharge CONTRACTOR's <br />legitimate obligations associated with prior <br />Applications for Payment. <br />3. The amount of retainage with respect <br />to progress payments will be as stipulated in <br />the Agreement. <br />B. Review of Applications <br />1. ENGINEER will, within 10 days after <br />receipt of each Application for Payment, either <br />indicate in writing a recommendation of <br />payment and present the Application to <br />OWNER or return the Application to <br />CONTRACTOR indicating in writing <br />ENGINEER's reasons for refusing to <br />recommend payment. In the latter case, CON- <br />TRACTOR may make the necessary <br />corrections and resubmit the Application. <br />2. ENGINEER's recommendation of <br />any payment requested in an Application for <br />Payment will constitute a representation by <br />ENGINEER to OWNER, based on <br />ENGINEER's observations on the Site of the <br />executed Work as an experienced and qualified <br />design professional and on ENGINEER'S <br />review of the Application for Payment and the <br />accompanying data and schedules, that to the <br />best of ENGINEER's knowledge, information <br />and belief: <br />a. the Work has progressed to the point <br />indicated; <br />b. the quality of the Work is generally in <br />accordance with the Contract Documents <br />(subject to an evaluation of the Work as a <br />functioning whole prior to or upon <br />Substantial Completion, to the results of any <br />subsequent tests called for in the Contract <br />Documents, to a final determination of <br />quantities and classifications for Unit Price <br />Work under paragraph 9.08, and to any <br />other qualifications stated in the <br />recommendation); and <br />c. The conditions precedent to <br />CONTRACTOR's being entitled to such <br />payment appear to have been fulfilled in so <br />far as it is ENGINEER's responsibility to <br />observe the Work. <br />3. By recommending any such <br />payment ENGINEER will not thereby be <br />deemed to have represented that: (i) inspec- <br />tions made to check the quality or the quantity <br />of the Work as it has been performed have <br />been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of <br />the Work in progress, or involved detailed <br />inspections of the Work beyond the responsi- <br />bilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in <br />the Contract Documents; or (ii) that there may <br />not be other matters or issues between the <br />parties that might entitle CONTRACTOR to be <br />paid additionally by OWNER or entitle OWNER <br />to withhold payment to CONTRACTOR. <br />4. Neither ENGINEER's review of <br />CONTRACTOR's Work for the purposes of <br />recommending payments nor ENGINEER's <br />recommendation of any payment, including final <br />payment, will impose responsibility on <br />ENGINEER to supervise, direct, or control the <br />Work or for the means, methods, techniques, <br />sequences, or procedures of construction, or <br />the safety precautions and programs incident <br />thereto, or for CONTRACTOR's failure to <br />comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to <br />CONTRACTOR's performance of the Work. <br />Additionally, said review or recommendation will <br />not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to <br />make any examination to ascertain how or for <br />what purposes CONTRACTOR has used the <br />moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, <br />or to determine that title to any of the Work, <br />materials, or equipment has passed to <br />OWNER free and clear of any Liens. <br />5. ENGINEER may refuse to recom- <br />mend the whole or any part of any payment if, <br />in ENGINEER's opinion, it would be incorrect to <br />make the representations to OWNER referred <br />to in paragraph 14.02.B.2. ENGINEER may <br />also refuse to recommend any such payment <br />or, because of subsequently discovered <br />evidence or the results of subsequent <br />inspections or tests, revise or revoke any such <br />payment recommendation previously made, to <br />such extent as may be necessary in <br />ENGINEER's opinion to protect OWNER from <br />loss because: <br />00700 - General Conditions REV 5-10-13 <br />00700 - 39 <br />F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1317-85th St Milling_91 st Ave to 101st Ave\Admin\bid documents\Master Contract Documents\00700 - General Conditions REV 5- <br />10-13.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.