Laserfiche WebLink
Consent Agenda Item <br /> 1?( fe....o <br /> ,A INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA <br /> * ,,I,*, DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br /> s?(ririiv�%, <br /> Date: April 30, 2015 <br /> To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator <br /> el <br /> From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Service 4$' <br /> Prepared By: Gordon Sparks, P.E., Environmental Engineer , 7.3 <br /> Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager „63 <br /> Subject: Final Payment for Engineering Consulting Services with Schulke, Bittle & <br /> Stoddard, LLC., for Professional services for engineering design, permitting <br /> and construction services for conflict resolutions between water and sewer <br /> mains and proposed drainage on US 1 South of 11th Street SW to the County <br /> line—UCP#4096 <br /> DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: <br /> On December 4, 2012 the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Work Order No. 2 with <br /> Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC, (SBS) for design, permitting, and construction phase services to resolve <br /> conflicts between existing water and sewer facilities and proposed paving and drainage improvements by <br /> the FDOT on US 1 from 11th Street south to the County Line. A total amount of$59,500 was approved for <br /> these professional services. On January 21, 2014 Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 2 was approved <br /> by the BCC for $18,741.88 for additional professional services as a result of revised drainage plans <br /> submitted by the FDOT bringing the total to $78,241.88. On April 29, 2015 SBS submitted Final invoice <br /> no. 12-147-23 for$1,653.68. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> The project is now substantially complete and construction services are now concluded. The total <br /> amount approved for engineering services was $78,241.88. This included $5,000 for reimbursables such <br /> as mailing, plan prints, copies and mileage. The actual design, permitting and construction services <br /> totaled, $73,241.88, however, reimbursables totaled $7,148.62 or $2,148.62 above what was approved. <br /> This was due primarily to design revisions by FDOT's consultant and field changes requiring additional <br /> construction plans, copies and travel time. However, additional funding for reimbursables were not <br /> included in Amendment No. 1 and this caused the overage in the original budgeted amount. The new <br /> total amount spent on the project is $80,390.50 or$2,148.62 over what was approved. <br /> FUNDING: <br /> Funding for the project in the original amount of$78,241.88 was made available for the South to County <br /> line Relocation account in the Utilities Fund. Funds for this project are derived from the R&R fund in the <br /> operating budget. The operating fund budget is derived from water and sewer sales. <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br /> 21 <br />