My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/19/2015 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
05/19/2015 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2018 1:17:06 PM
Creation date
8/12/2015 1:26:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
05/19/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
)5 <br /> INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br /> 7f, ccilik SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT z, y+ <br /> BOARD MEMORANDUM <br /> Date: May 6, 2015 <br /> To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator <br /> From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services 4 <br /> Prepared By: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District •" • <br /> Subject: Update on the Feasibility of Solid Waste Processing and Recycling Services <br /> DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: <br /> On December 16, 2014, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) directed staff to start a feasibility <br /> study and procurement process for the processing and recycling of solid waste in Indian River County <br /> (IRC). On January 6, 2015, Board approved Work Order No. 2 to Kessler Consulting, Inc. (KCI) to <br /> initiate a feasibility study and procurement process to identify opportunities, logistics, challenges <br /> and costs for such an endeavor with the purpose of moving us towards achieving the Florida <br /> Legislature recycling goal of 75% by the year 2020. <br /> The work order included a feasibility evaluation in Task 1 and a procurement process in Task 2. The <br /> purpose of this agenda is to provide a summary of the feasibility evaluation and obtain approval to <br /> proceed with the procurement process. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> KCI has provided the attached technical memorandum that summarizes the feasibility evaluation <br /> and outlines the structure of the procurement process. <br /> Technologies and Vendors <br /> As detailed by KCI, alternative processing technologies have gained attention in recent years in an <br /> effort to achieve higher recycling goals. Such technologies fall into three general categories: <br /> mechanical, biological/chemical, and thermal. Development of these technologies varies, but <br /> numerous companies operate demonstration or commercial facilities. <br /> Per KCI, numerous mixed waste processing facilities operate on a commercial-scale in the U.S. <br /> Unlike a traditional material recovery facility (MRF) at which source separated recyclables are <br /> processed, a mixed waste MRF recovers recyclables from the mixed municipal waste stream. Some <br /> state-of-the-art mixed waste MRFs report diverting up to 75% of the waste stream from disposal. <br /> Different technologies can be integrated into a single facility. For example, some facilities recover <br /> recyclable commodities, as well as organics for further processing through composting or anaerobic <br /> digestion (AD). <br /> SWDD Agenda-Update on Feasibility of Solid Waste Processing and Recycling Services Page 1 of 4 <br /> 261 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.