My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/02/2015 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
06/02/2015 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2018 2:16:38 PM
Creation date
8/12/2015 2:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
06/02/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. Is there a limited time period after authorization to receive construction funding? If funding is not <br /> received is the project de-authorized? YES, 7 YEARS PER WRRDA14 SECTION 6003. PER WRRDA14, <br /> THE PROJECT COULD BE DE-AUTHORIZED. <br /> 7. Can the local sponsor construct the renourishment events as a reimbursable project for the <br /> USACE?YES, PER SECTION 1014 OF WRRDA14 THAT AMENDED SECTION 204 OF WRRDA86. <br /> 8. Will the USACE consider the use of upland sand mines for construction?YES, UPLAND SOURCES <br /> WILL BE EVALUATED AS PART OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY. <br /> 9. Is the cost of mitigation and post-construction monitoring factored into the USACE's benefit-to- <br /> cost ratio?YES <br /> 10. Can the USACE conceptually describe the project that would receive a benefit-to-cost ratio of 1.0:1 <br /> (minimum ratio to receive federal funding)? For example...northern and southern project limits, <br /> volume of sand, mitigation,etc. ENCLOSED SHEET CONTAINTS SUMMARY FROM THE LIMITED RE- <br /> EVALUATION REPORT THAT WAS COMPLETED ON THE PROJECT IN 1999/2000. BCR WAS 1.4 FOR <br /> THIS PLAN. <br /> 223 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.