Laserfiche WebLink
unprofessional. If the Board did not overturn the decision of the Special Magistrate then the he <br /> would have to take it to court. <br /> MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN by the mover and the <br /> seconder. <br /> MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Wheeler, <br /> SECONDED by School Board Member Quimby, to <br /> approve the Special Magistrates' recommendations <br /> with the exception of V-421 and V-422. <br /> Attorney DeBraal pointed out that the Board just decided not to rehear a petition, and now they <br /> are going on Mr. Nolte's word alone, to upset what the Special Magistrate decided. His advised <br /> the Board that they hired the Special Magistrates to do a job, and they did the job. He counseled <br /> for this Board to sit as a Monday morning quarterback would be totally in error." <br /> Vice Chairman Wheeler said they did listen to Ms. Young's presentation and he did not feel <br /> there was enough evidence there to overturn that decision. Based on what Mr. Nolte said, who is <br /> the Property Appraiser, these are two separate cases, two separate circumstances, and the <br /> property sold for more than what it was appraised for. To then reduce the appraised value did not <br /> make sense. He said his motion stands. <br /> The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the <br /> motion carried, 3-2 (Commissioner Lowther and <br /> Chairman Davis opposed). The Board approved the <br /> Special Magistrates' recommendations excluding V- <br /> 421 and V-422. <br /> 4. APPROVAL OF VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD RESOLUTION 2006-01 - <br /> SETTING THE FILING FEE TO BE PAID TO THE CLERK OF THE VALUE <br /> ADJUSTMENT BOARD FOR 2006. <br /> ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Wheeler, <br /> SECONDED by Commissioner Lowther, the Board <br /> unanimously adopted the Value Adjustment Board <br /> Resolution 2006-01, setting the filing fee to be paid to <br /> the Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board. <br /> L <br /> Value Adjustment Board -4 - <br /> Meeting of 03082006 <br />