Laserfiche WebLink
2006 VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD (VAB) <br /> MINUTES OF MARCH 6, 2007 <br /> CONTINUATION OF MEETING OF MARCH 2, 2007 <br /> The Value Adjustment Board of Indian River County, Florida, met in regular session Tuesday, <br /> March 6, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. in Conference Room "B", County Administration Building, 1840 25th <br /> Street, Vero Beach, Fl. 32960. <br /> Present were Value Adjustment Board Chairman Gary C. Wheeler, Vice Chairman Wesley S. <br /> Davis, Board Members Peter D. O'Bryan, and Debbie MacKay(Karen Disney-Brombach was <br /> absent). Also present were Value Adjustment Board Attorney William "Bill"DeBraal, Property <br /> Appraiser David Nolte, and Value Adjustment Board Clerk Maria I. Suesz. <br /> 1. Petitioner 2006-0504—Dennis & Charlene Zarzycki—requesting to address the <br /> Board. <br /> (Clerk's Note: Dennis and Charlene Zarzycki verbally requested that the Board review the <br /> property appraiser's evidence used to determine the assessed value on their property, because <br /> they believe there is an error. This item was heard following Item 4. See Item 5 for discussion.) <br /> 2. Call to Order <br /> Chairman Wheeler called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. <br /> 3. Invocation —Board Member O'Bryan <br /> 4. Pledge of Allegiance—Board Member Debbie MacKay <br /> 5. Approval of Special Magistrates' Recommendations of 2006 Value Adjustment <br /> Board Hearings <br /> Charlene Zarzycki handed out evidence that was presented by the Property Appraiser at <br /> her VAB hearing on December 14, 2007 with the Special Magistrate. She was appealing the <br /> assessed value on her property for 2006 taxes, and the Special Magistrate recommendation was <br /> the Board deny relief for failure to "overcome the presumption of correctness"of the property <br /> appraiser (see worksheet attached). She wanted the Board to review the property appraiser's <br /> evidence,because she believed there was an error made. <br /> Property Appraiser David Nolte explained that Mrs. Zarzycki wanted a rehearing, and he <br /> thought if the Board rehears her petition, then they need to notify all petitioners that they have <br /> the right to a second hearing. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding the VAB rules and procedures, and the Board asked for <br /> legal advice. Attorney DeBraal advised the Board that they have the right to hear what Mrs. <br /> 2006 Continuation of Final VAB Meeting <br /> March 6, 2007 - 1 - <br />