03/22/2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• additional comments. He felt the Special Magistrate failed to translate the impact to the property in 2008 and 2009 tax years caused by a zoning change on the property, leaving the property owner the inability to build on his land. Attorney O'Haire asked the Board to send this Petition back to the Special Magistrate for a recommendation based on what he heard at the hearing and to further translate the damage into the impact on the property. He responded to questions from the Board. Discussion ensued regarding this request and the Board expressed their opinion and concerns. B. DISCUSSION BY PROPERTY APPRAISER DAVID NOLTE, OR HIS DESIGNEE David Nolte, Property Appraiser commented that all the factors that Attorney O'Haire mentioned had already been taken into consideration, be believed fairly, in the assessment, and that was the reason that the Special Magistrate did not make any further reduction. Chairman Flescher did not see a blatant error, and did not feel that the appeal should fall back on the Value Adjustment Board. The Board agreed. ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by Citizen Member Spytek, the Board unanimously denied the Petitioner's request for a second hearing with the Special Magistrate. C. STEPHEN BOYLE AND A TTORNEY PAUL BERG TO DISCUSS PETITION 2009- 0456 Petitioner Stephen Boyle brought documents to handout, and the Chairman refused submission of any additional evidence at this meeting. Mr. Boyle proceeded to explain his argument pertaining to his assessment being too low and portability. Mr. Boyle related that he appealed to the VAB for his home which he sold in June 2009, for substantially more than the Fair Market Value determined by the Property Appraiser on January 1, 2009. During the VAB hearing in December 2009, it was made clear that Mr. Boyle was not the current legal owner of Value Adjustment Board Final Meeting March 22, 2010 4