My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/10/2011
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
03/10/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2015 1:28:34 PM
Creation date
8/19/2015 1:28:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Value Adjustment Board
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/2011
Meeting Body
Value Adjustment Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.A. SPECIAL MAGISTRATES'RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT <br /> • After reviewing the Special Magistrates' Recommendations Report for the <br /> Board, Board Clerk Suesz asked for a motion to adopt the Report and authorize distribution of <br /> the Final Decision Forms DR-485V to the Petitioners. <br /> There was a brief discussion by VAB Attorney Hancock who clarified the Board <br /> needed to adopt just the remaining decisions excluding those previously voted upon. <br /> ON MOTION by School Board Member Johnson, <br /> SECONDED by Citizen Member Spytek, by a 4-0 vote <br /> (Vice Chairman Davis absent), the Board adopted the <br /> Special Magistrates' Recommendations Report, approving <br /> the Special Magistrates' Recommended Decisions as the <br /> VAB's Decisions, excluding Petitions 2010-0108, 2010- <br /> 0094, and 2010-0097 previously voted on separately, and <br /> authorized staff to distribute the Final Decision Forms <br /> 41, DR-485V to the Petitioners. <br /> 6.B. PETITIONER GEORGE MCCLOSKEY'S LETTER REGARDING PETITION 2010-0019 <br /> Board Clerk Suesz advised the Board that Mr. McCloskey's letter was added to <br /> the agenda packet as information only and no Board action was necessary. She briefed the <br /> Board stating that Mr. McCloskey had a hearing with the Special Magistrate, who remanded the <br /> Petition back to the Property Appraiser for additional review. In the remand process, Mr. <br /> McCloskey was granted partial relief by the Property Appraiser. Mr. McCloskey pursued his <br /> argument further requesting a continuation of his hearing. No further relief was granted by the <br /> Special Magistrate at the second hearing. <br /> • <br /> 2010 VAB FINAL MEETING 8 <br /> March 10,2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.