Laserfiche WebLink
9.B. VAB ATTORNEY DAVID HANCOCK'S REOUEST TO DISCUSS LEWIS BARTON <br /> • LITIGATION AGAINST THE VAB IN CIRCUIT COURT <br /> VAB Attorney Hancock briefed the Board regarding the Lewis Barton <br /> Litigation. He explained to Lewis Barton that the complaint he filed is not handled by the Value <br /> Adjustment Board. The VAB Attorney asked Mr. Barton to amend his complaint so the VAB <br /> would not be involved; or dismiss it and re-file correctly. Mr. Barton agreed and filed an <br /> amendment to the complaint, but the filing was defective. The VAB Attorney filed a motion to <br /> dismiss, and advised the Board there was very little prospect that this complaint would continue <br /> involving the VAB. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding previous VAB Petitions filed by Lewis Barton over the <br /> years. <br /> Chairman Flescher thanked the Board Clerk and the Property Appraiser staff for all that <br /> they do for the VAB. <br /> • 10. ADJOURNMENT <br /> There being no further business, the Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at <br /> 4:30 p.m. <br /> 764.14ti )4,e2,44e2 <br /> foie : Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk oseph E. Flescher, Chairman <br /> Minutes Approved: 2 l • 1� <br /> MIS/2010FinalMtg.Minutes <br /> Attachments: Special Magistrate's Recommendation(2), <br /> VAB Attorney's prepared rationale of fmdings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Petition <br /> 2010-0108. <br /> 2010 VAB FINAL MEETING 11 <br /> March 10,2011 <br />