Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Hancock advised that Mr Preuss was in the process of receiving his MAI. <br /> L <br /> Citizen Member Spytek believed an alternate should be someone who had experience as <br /> a Special Magistrate; however, School Board Member Johnson agreed with Citizen Member <br /> Weise, and she expressed she often hears that emphasis is put on experience, yet there is no way <br /> to get experience, and she felt that the Board would be giving him an opportunity to learn. She <br /> suggested that Mr. Preuss be involved on a voluntary basis and preside at a hearing to observe. <br /> The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the <br /> Motion carried, by a 3-1 vote (Citizen Member Spytek <br /> opposed and Vice Chairman Davis absent). The Board <br /> appointed Adam Preuss as the alternate Special <br /> Magistrate. <br /> Applicant John Robinson refuted a statement made regarding his experience alleging that <br /> he had served as Special Magistrate since 1994, not 1997, and that he has been certified as a MAI <br /> (Master Appraisal Institute) since 1989. He wanted to know what factor carried the weight in the <br /> Board's decision process. He wanted to know if the requested rate of pay was the driving factor, <br /> and questioned whether the Board realized that there are two different types of Board <br /> certifications. <br /> Chairman Flescher responded on behalf of himself, to the fact that it was experience, <br /> location, and the requested rate combined, as Mr. Robinson mentioned. He advised that all the <br /> Board Members have had an opportunity to review the applications, take input of the Board <br /> Clerk, and he hoped that all Board Members have utilized everything that was afforded to them in <br /> making their decision. <br /> Page 9 <br /> Value Adjustment Board <br /> Organizational Meeting <br /> July 18,2011 <br />