My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/31/2009
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2009
>
07/31/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 12:08:16 PM
Creation date
8/20/2015 11:56:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L <br />L <br />continue with $105.00 per hour, plus mileage, for <br />Appraiser Special Magistrates. <br />After discussion and the foregoing Motion, the Board asked that the VAB Board Clerk ensure that <br />the Board is provided a summary of the hourly rate and include travel expenses from other <br />counties in the future. <br />10. APPOINTMENT OF DESIGNEE(S) FOR VAB TO DETERMINE GOOD CAUSE <br />FOR LATE FILED PETITIONS PURSUANT TO PTO BULLETIN 08-1C (AUGUST 29, <br />2008, AND PROPOSED RULE 12D-9.106 (FAC) <br />The VAB Attorney David Hancock reviewed the changes made in the DOR proposed <br />rules regarding the Board designating someone to review the late filed good cause petitions to <br />determine good cause. He preferred the Board designate a mixed committee, instead of one <br />person because of the challenges that one person may be presented with, if they were the only <br />designee. He imagined a mixed committee could be the Chairman, the VAB Attorney, and the <br />VAB Board Clerk. <br />Property Appraiser David Nolte addressed his concerns regarding the delays in certifying <br />the tax roll due to the late filing of good cause petitions. <br />Chief Deputy Jeff Smith addressed additional costs to the Tax Collector and the Property <br />Appraiser, due to delays in certifying the tax roll. <br />Commissioner Flescher suggested extending the deadline only five days for accepting <br />late filing good cause petitions, to give the public a shorter window of opportunity. <br />Discussion continued regarding the VAB establishing deadlines, and the VAB Attorney <br />Hancock clarified that the Board does not have the authority to lengthen or shorten the filing <br />periods under the current existing statutes, and he defined the parameters of accepting or rejecting <br />late filed petitions according to the existing statutes. <br />VAB ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.