Laserfiche WebLink
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />TOP 10 CUSTOMERS OF WATER AND SEWER BY REVENUE <br />CUSTOMERS WATER REVENUE SEWER REVENUE <br />Village Green MHP <br />$146,257 <br />$221,332 <br />ACr S. Inc. <br />114,118 <br />195,540 <br />Disney's Vero Beach Resort <br />69,404 <br />16,173 <br />Was of Vero <br />43,076 <br />64,270 <br />River Run <br />29,068 <br />33,234 <br />Holiday Inn <br />28,684 <br />38,404 <br />Indian River County Jail <br />26,859 <br />35,190 <br />Indian River Village Care Center <br />15,320 <br />20,873 <br />Wal-Mart Stores <br />8,572 <br />12,506 <br />Inn Vero <br />5,215 <br />6,987 <br />The following table compares average daily flow versus peak daily flow for both water and sewer for <br />the past five years. <br />• Volume in Million Gallons <br />Rate Suvetme <br />Historically, the County's rates for water and sewer service have been sufficient to meet the applicable <br />rate covenants, with respect to the County's obligations under the Master Bond Resolution. The rates for the <br />System are projected to be sufficient through Fiscal Year 1996 to comply with the rate covenant for the Series <br />1996 Bonds. The System has rates for both residential and commercial classes of customers. <br />In September 1991, the County passed a rate resolution (Resolution No. 91-145), adopted pursuant to <br />the authority of Ordinance 91.9, which established water and wastewater rates for the years 1991, 1992 and 1993, <br />and which were then to remain in effect until further amended. These rates remain effective as of the date <br />hereof and the County has no present plea to increase such rates. The basis for Resolution 91-145 was a'Water <br />and Waste Water Fee & Rate Study" (the "Study"), dated September 1991, prepared by the County's Consulting <br />Engineer. The Study investigated the annual coat of operating and maintaining the water and wastewater systems <br />and recommended rates, charges and policies which are both sufficient to recover these coats and equitable to <br />the allocation of these costa to the different user classes. The analysis also included anticipated capital <br />improvements for the period covered by the Study. <br />18 <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />AVERAGE DAILY FLOW VS. PEAK DAILY FLOW <br />Water* Sewer* <br />Year Ended 9/30 <br />Annual Average Annual Peak Annual Average <br />Annual Peak <br />Daily Flow Daily Flow Daily Flow <br />Daily Flow <br />1991 <br />2.79 3.10 1.34 <br />1.90 <br />1992 <br />2.84 3.30 1.40 <br />1.89 <br />1993 <br />3.23 4.10 1.79 <br />2.59 <br />1994 <br />3.47 4.60 2.37 <br />3.30 <br />1995 <br />3.48 4.40 2.41 <br />2.80 <br />• Volume in Million Gallons <br />Rate Suvetme <br />Historically, the County's rates for water and sewer service have been sufficient to meet the applicable <br />rate covenants, with respect to the County's obligations under the Master Bond Resolution. The rates for the <br />System are projected to be sufficient through Fiscal Year 1996 to comply with the rate covenant for the Series <br />1996 Bonds. The System has rates for both residential and commercial classes of customers. <br />In September 1991, the County passed a rate resolution (Resolution No. 91-145), adopted pursuant to <br />the authority of Ordinance 91.9, which established water and wastewater rates for the years 1991, 1992 and 1993, <br />and which were then to remain in effect until further amended. These rates remain effective as of the date <br />hereof and the County has no present plea to increase such rates. The basis for Resolution 91-145 was a'Water <br />and Waste Water Fee & Rate Study" (the "Study"), dated September 1991, prepared by the County's Consulting <br />Engineer. The Study investigated the annual coat of operating and maintaining the water and wastewater systems <br />and recommended rates, charges and policies which are both sufficient to recover these coats and equitable to <br />the allocation of these costa to the different user classes. The analysis also included anticipated capital <br />improvements for the period covered by the Study. <br />18 <br />