|
t. . ._ -,F,- a :, t.ksa} ✓tea : ,y, � m ss '•� � -.art}: n ;j. "a s} r d ;. c a
<br />' a xc.z -9 ':;e: .z' , «. . s r " 3
<br /> s x' -'f4. �"� . '' i � u »'r d�� ri, s r k.;e v';•, ,: 3 w � r Z ,. ': ., h M f-
<br /> F §h .x. ,,: w . dn. : e4.. r..•l. 4� .Ja'3. . `Y` .. ::.,... R- ...v.a. , � Sa l a.b„Y . .a' I 5 ,
<br /> i -
<br /> ,.�.
<br /> . . « ?{ . ,. �:., x' .i. ,5 d .nx<� fix. ✓ + . .. c - , x .. �d "v "�
<br /> 3n
<br /> TO : James E . Chandler
<br /> t
<br /> County Administrator
<br /> D 'ISI N HEAD GONCLR.R_ENCE :
<br /> art M . eating , A CP
<br /> Community Development D11 UL
<br /> THROt GH : Stan Boling, A1CP
<br /> Planning Director
<br /> FROM : Mark Zans Mt
<br /> Senior Planner, Current Development
<br /> DATE : September 13 , 2001
<br /> SUBJECT : Brackett, Parker & Associates Request for Final Plat Approval for Greystone
<br /> Subdivision ( f/k/a Brook Haven Subdivision ) .
<br /> It is requested that the data herein presented be g11en formal consideration by the Board of County
<br /> Commissioners at its regular meeting of October , , 2001 .
<br /> DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS :
<br /> Greystone is a 21 lot subdivision of a 8 . 84 acre parcel that is located on the north side of 5 ” Street
<br /> SIX (Rebel Road) , east of 58 " Avenue and west of 43 `d Avenue . The property is zoned RS - 3
<br /> ( Residential Single - family up to 3 units/acre ) and has an L- 1 ( Low Density 1 up to 3 units / acre )
<br /> land use des = ation . The density of the subdivision is 2 . 37 units/acre .
<br /> On April 13 , 2000 , the Planning and Zoning Cotnmission granted preliminary plat approval for
<br /> Grevstone ( f1Ja Brook Haven Subdivision) . The developer, Brackett , Parker & Associates
<br /> subsequently obtained a land development permit and has completed some of the construction of the
<br /> required subdivision improvements . The developer is now requesting final plat approval and has
<br /> submitted the following :
<br /> 1 . A final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary plat , and
<br /> 2 . A cost estimate for the remaining required improvements , and
<br /> 3 . A contract for construction of remaining required improvements , and
<br /> 4 . A security arrangement guaranteeing the contract for construction .
<br /> ANALYSIS :
<br /> Some of the subdivision improvements have been completed , and the developer proposes to bond -
<br /> out for construction of the remaining required improvements to proceed with final plat approval .
<br /> The format of the final plat and the financial security has been approved by the County Attorney ' s
<br /> October 2 , 2001
<br /> 52
<br /> C ; p ;
<br /> K .o
<br /> w
<br /> s i s t
<br /> � as, ,.- � •. � � . .,x�:r< . re ��F,.-„,�%;�,Gar, , ,nx `ixa 's"�:�'� �`h.�,� ''��.”° �'
<br /> .' .A,
<br /> �Jr^Y#
<br /> 'u :.c,z -i , f .s , v kh ,sF,=: v:- +`se sx 4r "'r`.: 34 ..v'!•. 5 x `" .. zr
<br /> "� 5''=FS -
<br /> .. s ' w "k' . '"%"tiv:. '�`Pt .✓,d43, cr. r� ?'
<br /> 5.
<br /> ;fi` a y 't. s ✓•ti' ¢^�a x- t' .ab 'Sy Jww4' y £ �N ..#- d e$ ' a '...
<br />
|