My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
10/23/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2020 4:53:33 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:30:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
10/23/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2547
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CDBG Application Cycle <br />Neighborhood Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation, and Commercial Revitalization <br />CDBG applications are subject to an annual application cycle. The next application <br />deadline is March 2002. The Economic Development CDBG application time frame, <br />however, is different. Instead of being limited to annual cycles, Economic Development <br />CDBG applications may be submitted monthly. In most cases, Economic Development <br />CDBG applications are related to private development projects. <br />Consultant <br />According to the state's CDBG program rules, up to 8% of the CDBG funds can be <br />Utilized to cover the cost of application preparation and project administration. These <br />functions could be performed by a consultant. By using a consultant to prepare the <br />application and administer the project, the county would get the benefit of the <br />consultant's expertise with the program. Most consultants will prepare the application at <br />no charge to the county, provided that the consultant is assured of administering the <br />project if funded. If the application receives funding, the consultant would get a <br />percentage of the project cost, ranging from 5% to 8%, for administering the project. If <br />the project does not get funded, there would be no cost to the county for the consultant <br />having prepared the application. <br />CDBG Citizen Advisory Task Force <br />As part of the CDBG program requirements, each jurisdiction submitting an application <br />to the CDBG program must integrate citizen input into the application process. That <br />process involves holding at least two public hearings, and convening a meeting of the <br />CDBG Citizen Advisory Task Force (a Board appointed citizen task force) to review the <br />CDBG application before it is submitted to DCA. In previous application cycles, the <br />County's existing CDBG Citizen Advisory Task Force (CATF) was activated to review <br />all applications and provide a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. <br />For the upcoming application cycle, the CATF should again be activated. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The Community Block Grant program is a competitive process. Accordingly, each <br />jurisdiction's application is scored and competes with applications submitted by other <br />jurisdictions. Through the process, all applications are ranked from highest to lowest. <br />CDBG funds are then allocated to those jurisdictions with the highest scores until all the <br />funds are utilized. <br />While the county may not apply for commercial revitalization category grants because <br />the county does not have a community redevelopment agency, the County can pursue <br />grants in either the Housing Rehabilitation or Neighborhood Revitalization categories. <br />Housing Rehabilitation grants are available to make improvements to sub -standard <br />housing and to demolish dilapidated housing, as well as to help finance new homes for <br />displaced residents. Neighborhood Revitalization grants on the other hand, can fund <br />various infrastructure improvements within a neighborhood, including road paving, <br />potable water improvements and hookups, and fire hydrants. <br />In both 1999 and 2000, Indian River County submitted CDBG applications in the <br />Neighborhood Revitalization category. Because of the competitiveness of the <br />Neighborhood Revitalization category, neither application scored high enough to be <br />funded. Generally, the Housing category is less competitive than the Neighborhood <br />OCTOBER 23, 2001 <br />—69— <br />e C20 P Un 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.