Laserfiche WebLink
address these deficiencies. Fruth identified tools that communities can use to improve <br />their economies. Those tools include: a positive, "business -friendly" community attitude, <br />good labor force, expedited permitting, and adequate public infrastructure. Subsequent to <br />Fruth's initial presentation, a workshop for local government and private sector leaders <br />was held to discuss the results of the study. One recommendation that came out of the <br />workshop was to establish an Economic Development Public/Private Task Force to <br />review the permitting process with the objective of expediting local, state and regional <br />permitting for new manufacturing companies. On July 10, 2001, the Board of County <br />Commissioners established the Economic Development Public/Private Task Force to <br />review the permitting process and to identify ways to improve that process. That Task <br />Force has formed and has convened three times. <br />At its July 31, 2001 meeting, the Economic Development Public/Private Task Force <br />discussed the development plan approval and permitting process. One issue which arose <br />at that meeting was turnaround times for permits at the state, regional and local levels. <br />Consequently, the Economic Development Public/Private Task Force decided to review <br />the County's development plan approval and permitting process at its next meeting. <br />At the August 16, 2001 meeting of the Economic Development Public/Private Task <br />Force, staff presented a report on the County's site plan review and approval process. <br />That process applies to construction of new industrial development projects as well as <br />expansion of existing industrial facilities. At the meeting, the task force asked staff to <br />compile information on staff -only approval thresholds for other jurisdictions in Florida <br />and to draft an amendment to the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to <br />raise the threshold for staff -only approvals from 10,000 square feet of new impervious <br />surface to an 80,000 square foot threshold for non-residential projects. <br />At the September 5, 2001 meeting of the Economic Development Public/Private Task <br />Force, staff presented a draft LDR Amendment to increase the staff -level approval <br />threshold from 10,000 square feet of new impervious surface area to 80,000 square feet <br />of new impervious surface area. At that meeting, Task Force members indicated that their <br />original recommendation of 80,000 square feet referred to building area and not <br />impervious surface area. Once that point was clarified, the Task Force recommended a <br />higher threshold for staff level approval, and staff has prepared a revised proposed LDR <br />amendment that raises the threshold for staff -level approval to 150,000 square feet of new <br />impervious surface for non-residential permitted use projects. That proposed LDR <br />amendment is attached to this report. <br />PSAC and PZC Actions <br />At its September 27, 2001 meeting, the Professional Services Advisory Committee <br />(PSAC) considered and supported the proposed amendment with an additional and <br />related LDR change. That additional change involves establishing a specific timeframe <br />for staff decisions on site plans (see attachment #3). Staff supports this additional <br />change, and that change has been incorporated into the proposed amendment (see <br />attachment #1). <br />At its September 27, 2001 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) <br />considered and supported the proposed amendment on a 4-2 vote (see attachment #4). <br />One of the two dissenting votes was due to that Commissioner's desire to have all <br />permitted uses (no threshold limit) approved at a staff -level. At the September 27, 2001 <br />PZC meeting, staff informed the PZC of the addition supported by the PSAC and staff. <br />OCTOBER 23, 2001 <br />-57- <br />pit <br />