Laserfiche WebLink
it and try to buy the property for preservation so industrial does not go there. <br />Barbara Banfield, Roseland, wished this would be the last time this issue comes up. <br />If this property is rezoned industrial, from residential, agricultural, and conservation, it will <br />not be good for Roseland. She asked that if the Board goes forward that they do so very <br />carefully. She would like this situation to go away, but knew that would not happen. <br />Chairman Stanbridge outlined the Board's options as set out in the memorandum. <br />County Attorney Paul Bangel added that the Board could also take no action. <br />Commissioner Ginn thought it needed to be deferred. She understood the adjacent <br />property was zoned for 6 units/acre and knew industrial would be preferred, not <br />conservation. There is also an airport which could possibly generate future noise <br />complaints. She wanted the opportunity to talk with staff about some alternatives. <br />Commissioner Adams thought the Board needed to take action or give some definite <br />direction to staff, or perhaps break it into pieces and look at it that way. Continually putting <br />it off is not good. <br />Commissioner Ginn asked if the County was obligated to provide access. <br />Chairman Stanbridge believed there were other issues to be addressed first. The <br />Florida Communities Trust (FCT) and the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) with US Fish <br />& Wildlife Service (USF & WS) are all tied to this. The County has to do first things first. <br />In her opinion, the first issue to be addressed is for staff to look into the FCT funding used <br />to purchase the property. Staff needs to find a better way to do this. <br />Commissioner Adams replied that staff has not found a better way because the matter <br />keeps coming back to the Board in a public discussion format. The County Attorney had <br />it because staff has chosen not to try to work with this. <br />Administrator Chandler understood that as late as yesterday, there have been a couple <br />of property owners working with the County Attorney's office and that has not involved <br />January 15, 2002 <br />90 <br />fl <br />lJ � r <br />