Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED <br />by Vice Chairman Tippin, to refer this matter to staff for their <br />review and recommendation. (This includes environmental <br />issues, the relationship with FCT, the propriety of putting a <br />right-of-way where it has been proposed, and any other <br />concerns. This should be on one proposal.) <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Ginn referred to the map on page 340 in the back <br />up and wanted to see superimposed on that the outline of Lots 19 and 20 so the <br />Commissioners will know exactly what type of land will be affected and what its <br />relationship is to other types. <br />Time frame was discussed and there was CONSENSUS to bring it back early in <br />February. (Clerk's Note: This matter was considered again on Feb. 5, 2002.) <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />Commissioner Adams wanted it on record that she was alarmed at the threat on Item <br />7.S. in the Consent Agenda. It sounded like a veiled physical threat and she thought it <br />should be sent on to an appropriate authority. <br />Commissioner Ginn and Chairman Stanbridge were also concerned. <br />Chaimian Stanbridge had spoken with Attorney Bangel and understood it was not <br />something that should come to the Board until he has a lawsuit against the County. <br />January 15, 2002 <br />92 <br />n,^ 0 �] <br />(0 f F <br />