|
as , c .;z; e 3Er ,+ x �„ 1F + � „ '° x r t IW
<br /> +t x x r s y1 � .#` . ' .r fi✓ 1k4Y,+ x` .#<. v
<br /> v✓u , ', .., l +., ✓i
<br /> , r a
<br /> ,„e s :ry.... ' - ,� ... X..F . ' t z N £; ,., xr 9 f....;F ,r #. x.. a •t ,e x ,z ,<w a.,,
<br /> m r -z w a a.,„ ,+� s
<br /> !:' ^' ", 5 ' y4' 4'2 .. , , ; " ri, �,. xn'"' e cN.r't ; ;, :i r a
<br /> "i* >..:.. ': e
<br /> .a ek._
<br /> ^, . . .• , ���`,` n ..,..a .� w, .. ",9 W,_ � � '� ; e.2, ti Ns -„o- k. . .
<br /> w
<br /> R
<br /> BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
<br /> Caroline D. Ginn Fran B. Adams
<br /> Chairman 4 GI District 1
<br /> District 5
<br /> a K Kenneth R . Macht
<br /> Ruth M. Stanbridge * * District 3
<br /> Vice Chairman
<br /> District ? �loRlOp' John W. Tippin
<br /> District 4
<br /> January 24 , 2001
<br /> The Honorable Jeb Bush
<br /> Office of the Governor
<br /> The Capitol
<br /> Tallahassee , FL 32399-0001
<br /> Dear Governor Bush :
<br /> The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners has learned of some disturbing details in the legal
<br /> dispute over sovereign lands and the development of the river islands claimed by the Lost Tree Village ( LTV)
<br /> Corporation . It is our understanding that a new "settlement agreement" has been proposed and may be
<br /> scheduled before the Governor and Cabinet as early as February 6th .
<br /> In a unanimous vote , the Board of County Commissioners is objecting to this settlement agreement, given the
<br /> information available . It should be painfully obvious that the State of Florida must protect the sovereign lands ,
<br /> which belongs to all of the people . To cause an agreement to happen that would do irreversible harm and
<br /> degrade the Indian River Lagoon would be unconscionable . The legal questions on the sovereign lands are
<br /> very pertinent with long-range implications , and this matter should not be reduced to a political decision . We
<br /> are also disappointed that any settlement agreement of this magnitude would even be considered without
<br /> dialogue and input from the county government.
<br /> Almost a year ago during the Legislative session , another settlement agreement was circulated . This was
<br /> supported by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and allowed development on some of these river
<br /> islands , with a commitment of "up to $ 14 million dollars" of Indian River County bond money . That settlement
<br /> agreement was slated to be introduced by a Cabinet member without the county's knowledge or input. We ,
<br /> again , voted to object and remove the funding source, and that proposal was withdrawn .
<br /> The specific details of this Department of Environmental Protection/LTV agreement are sketchy . Enough
<br /> information has been forthcoming about the proposed residential development and dockage on three of the
<br /> islands , and golf courses on the other three , to cause alarm about the dangerous and detrimental impacts to
<br /> the Lagoon. This absurd proposal not only effects the fragile ecosystem of the Lagoon , but the surrounding
<br /> landowners , the general public, and the ability of local, state , and federal government to protect the Lagoon .
<br /> E `
<br /> The Indian River Lagoon is extremely important to Indian River County and to the quality of life that has
<br /> protected and sustained an economy that continues to grow, in both good times and bad . Our county , along
<br /> with the other counties along the Lagoon , has diligently worked to restore , rejuvenate , and protect the natural
<br /> resources of this remarkable river - a river that is called a National Treasure and an Estuary of International
<br /> Importance .
<br /> F ,
<br /> The citizens of Indian River County are purchasing hundreds of acres of wetlands , are successfully managing
<br /> development through local regulations , and are launching comprehensive and very expensive sto;mwater
<br /> management plans to drastically reduce the pollutant loading from the already existing developments and golf
<br /> courses . To have a settlement agreement put forth , especially before the Governor and Cabinet, that would
<br /> place residential development and golf courses directly in the middle of this estuary contradicts the policies of
<br /> both the State and Federal agencies , and flies in the face of all local efforts .
<br /> ti
<br /> Recently, Indian River County became one of only five counties in the State , and the only one along the
<br /> Indian River Lagoon , to have an approved Manatee Protection Plan . The impact of a single dock may be
<br /> considered minor, but the cumulative impacts of a multitude of docks is documented and can constitute a
<br /> disaster for manatees and surrounding seagrass beds . Most of the time single-family docks are under the
<br /> threshold for regulations , so there would be no protection from the dockage of numerous powerboats and the
<br /> guaranteed consequences .
<br /> Ilk
<br /> { L
<br /> I b Por 877
<br /> b JANUARY 30 , 2001 - 3 -
<br /> u
<br /> au 4 . h +-">e '' 'sic`i 'k4mk 'E+L,:: x xil+ 2 ,.'. r
<br /> 3 �', YT }' atv w"4 i t� 'i 1'Y-ys, ,.+1, .; 7a= � %,�x"�<„�'qr+{ t• ;: avY At+� ,%au ..r o ^-� r ,-.r ^' J S
<br /> , l t ..: a Y �. .. �;r .>n3EX ,.Iv: � ' ' �
<br /> �'` .,;y d ,r�% tT . ,r, }„" �{.: .".n +z,p'4.: - , m, • <. ..: 3 # P t'* :`1 " ` , ,y. = u,� , r t
<br /> k
<br /> x .:.,„ < '�gxz.. s , :•y: „r, : . b3 -{#e__##,,s.€r �"fdf s y? a:s� x a >e a, . :: r ;, ,z z
<br /> a v w + zd ' ,
<br /> r ? � � P ,e •S ;� a t
<br /> JrA
<br /> -
<br /> ri "xt 4.'t °`� '`rc. ..q tW'Cz,�d„�t xb"'" .1 . ``z;'.n 3 F"4r� + $ z F �+ ,�,-, 1 '4 s , " '+
<br /> a r svN r t ♦ '"-xs :trLM a^ s . ; is
<br /> { - `e
<br />
|