My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
01/22/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:46:17 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:34:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
01/22/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2551
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The definition of a specimen tree as a native tree with a dbh of greater than 24 <br />inches was too broad and included to many trees. <br />The definition of a Specimen Tree was changed to read 'any native tree with a dbh of <br />greater than 30 inches.' <br />• Within the definition of a Specimen Tree there was a requirement that the tree have <br />"no major insect problem". There was concern that this was too broad, or was not <br />clearly defined. <br />A Condition Rating was added that not only clearly defines the condition of the tree, but <br />also, in conjunction with other information, defines the size of the CRZ <br />• It is unclear if a tree removal or land clearing permit is required for single-family <br />home use within agriculture zoning districts. <br />Language was added that states that a land clearing or tree removal permit is required for <br />single-family use in agi iculture zoning districts, provided the parceUlot is greater than <br />one acre. <br />• There were concerns about overly regulating the removal of non-native plants (i.e., <br />requiring land clearing and/or tree removal permits). <br />A statement was added that the removal of non-native plants by cutting them down, not <br />removal via or with the root, is exempt; however, removal must be accompanied by <br />treatment of the stumps using an EPA approved herbicide. <br />• There were concerns about the size of the CRZ, especially as it may relate to the <br />species of tree, the age, and/or condition. <br />The CRZ, was refined by using species of the tree, Condition Rating of the tree, response <br />to impact, and age of the tree. This results in a range of values from 0.5 to 1.5 feet per <br />inch of dbh. <br />• There were comments that the saved trees might be able to withstand some impacts <br />within the CRZ. <br />Impacts can be allowed within CRZ for protected trees (1/2 of CRZ may be impacted for <br />protected trees; no impacts within CRZ for specimen trees). <br />This issue was later modified by the PSAC subcommittee by adding details on <br />acceptable impacts that can occur within the CRZ, to within one (1) foot of the trunk of <br />the tree (either protected or specimen tree). Generally, these are restricted to pavement <br />impacts. <br />As a result of the changes noted above, tree protection has been enhanced. Specimen trees <br />represent only the largest of trees, generally those in need of more protection. 1 he CRZ is now <br />more representative of actual conditions (i.e., species, age, condition, and impact response). <br />Removal of non-native trees, by cutting down, is now encouraged because the removal is exempt <br />from the need for a per mit. <br />Summary of issues raised at PSAC subcommittee <br />The following is a list of issues raised at the PSAC subcommittee meetings (bold items are issues <br />raised by the PSAC subcommittee; the information following the issue is staffs response): <br />• Use of sampling methods on smaller lots/parcels. <br />Sampling methods can be used on sites that are greater than '/4 of an acre, instead of the <br />original one acre size. <br />This issue has been addressed, as noted above, in the current draft. <br />JANUARY 22, 2002 <br />-30- <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.