Laserfiche WebLink
outside the urban service area and required the creation ofprivate roadways, which were not <br />required to be paved. There was always an access to a County paved road. <br />Commissioner Ginn clarified that those options were allowed outside the urban <br />service area previously. • <br />Director Boling confirmed that they had been allowed outside the urban service area <br />until October 23, 2001. <br />In response to questioning about further subdivision after the initial affidavit of <br />exemption process, Director Boling noted that the property owner must record a statement <br />stating that any further subdivision will require a regular subdivision process. This is a <br />method for subdividing lands which interface between agricultural lands and urban lands <br />Marvin Carter asked the Board to reinstate the affidavit of exemption process <br />outside of the urban service area as he felt there is a need for the process. <br />George Beuttel, 5000 16' Street, believed the process allows people of modest <br />means to have acreage and privacy and asked the Board to reinstate the process. <br />Max Cross, 2100 Oyster Bay, spoke in favor of the process. <br />Peter Robinson, 315 Greytwig Road, also spoke in favor of the process. <br />John Baker, 1281 Indian Mound Trail, was in favor of the process. <br />Commissioner Ginn was in favor of low density but wanted people to be aware that <br />there are no provisions for utilities outside the urban service area. <br />JANUARY 22, 2002 <br />-54- <br />