|
t , �.' `i; y... .� ._ , �; x,= rx rb . .. .a,,.r, z- r ,.._ y * ;,r � � ".. .r-„ * �,
<br /> a,.. �' ..; ', ✓ = :r :_ ., .. ,. ,-a.
<br /> �.., ,. ,. s�%= •'at. ��_� �5"��"' ;::.,.,:+kd "?ia=?'" 5y y,,�� a��;�'i'�v3 =u �,..., ... � y�{$�` ,, "v
<br /> .;# , v�c,�� . »n. >g r
<br /> xk� . • - , - N� , a 't �+�4 ,t T.rr.�? 2§ Yl v Y. �'.� ��F�`«"iXt �F S "" �S�A . £.`r a'f �
<br /> Y. 45� �`„, 15
<br /> +. -
<br /> Y
<br /> ATTACHMENTS
<br /> 1 . Summary Page
<br /> 2 . Rezoning Application
<br /> 3 . Unapproved Minutes of the January 11 , 2001 , Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
<br /> 4 . Rezoning Ordinance
<br /> Director Keating responded to concerns of the Commissioners regarding the 4 - 3
<br /> Planning and Zoning Commission ' s vote ; the 14 - acre out- parcel being developed as
<br /> commercial (would have to be a County- initiated rezoning request) ; and limiting rezoning
<br /> on the property to RM - 6 rather than RM- 8 .
<br /> There was a brief discussion concerning the appropriateness of RM- 6 or RM- 8
<br /> zoning on SR 60 and the necessity and demand for multi - family housing , whether it is
<br /> affordable housing or not ,
<br /> The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
<br /> in this matter .
<br /> David Knight, Knight & McGuire & Associates , Inc . , appeared representing the
<br /> applicant . He pointed out that the land use plan supports RM - 8 in this area and that there
<br /> is a need for multi - family housing in the community . He stressed that RM- 8 is not high
<br /> density with respect to most multi - family projects . He stated that the adjacent RS - 6
<br /> property was built in the 1960 ' s when water and sewer connections were not available
<br /> and cautioned that non - approval of RM- 8 will encourage expansion of the urban service
<br /> area for future multi - family needs . He asked the Board to consider these points and
<br /> encouraged the Board to follow staff' s recommendation for RM- 8 zoning .
<br /> John Servos . 1745 7151 Court , pointed out that there is only a short frontage of this
<br /> proposed development on SR 60 . He thought RM- 8 zoning was a little bit too much for ;
<br /> the area because these "high- rises " will be in the "backyards " of the homes (zoned RS - 6 )
<br /> January 23 , 2001
<br /> 52
<br /> BK 1 65 Pri 333
<br /> 4;,,
<br /> k . ],
<br /> ,.. , x ,Fs - .
<br /> ;3" - � .. ��^
<br /> n
<br /> ,`'� .
<br /> sr.. -. ,e ... .. ;u' .",fi .: 3 .. , �:{z• , � � . . . ,x. .`�y. , ti � m. i ,T�u. -,a.- � ,�, , . . �
<br /> ��Pt .f, y^v�-0���� >, a aix� k SS� .""', ,a �" .::y
<br /> . ., sa a '-�=s :.. � ,Ty�'s•�' . ;,. �3;v���' m H...2 a ;P � eL., `5� , ..: %. q�� rs,A�" e _ .,
<br /> ,,. .rmm � ..;c -.�, .uC -''& r r .:9R�.� �. . f. :. a, r ,.'�: , '�`s .? .
<br /> wrz; � ' .w . ,� . . : - .>, , „t � .,�, , ,, . :,. • ' e. . , „ � .:s, 1�"�, . , ... - *n- . �-,:.
<br /> . , � `:�,t ��. +� . �' , Z^"k. '% 4 .0 ._. � i.�. " - �.�.. .. � .+ ,. .xr$,: .. .,, - du• .: ' „w«;�r,.p:. .
<br /> x a, r ^� ' , {j 'b". vF' i x �s "Kt z ,. Jn° n: -e;z "S ,..' a ,; , S"m"`, ^.; ` '.b" }+i
<br /> Y 2 `2' ' .* F 5+rw, , w =;": 'aa.,,,:✓ "' 34 " > q
<br /> '�° xw�'^-§ z -. ,.: � ' :,. �..: "{-,. fe; :._ . .. ��''�',, °k+'. 'Jnr ,.*.'axk'�t�km�v,.'r" ���#a?�5��':�»t '�,`Y:.�i
<br />. ��,.. a._^. z„nit=�,�..,`rk� ,.2� .:'se•u .3rm',E;'.51 ;�r�SA�r�',+•t ,tr"_ 's%n`�"'°c��''��¢ai'S �P�:r , ,r iii ,�d+w,. ��'' $"`.>.w-��u'���.'+.-sah,.r'�
<br /> tt xs. ,
<br />
|