1/23/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3 ' , 1 1 71F71l ni a L 4 k . 1 f •t t X; } l i , .. y„ . t; .^ti�-Prgw&t .ar ?z,. l . ' r ,a. , :ice W r !s i MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED for discussion by Vice Chairman Stanbridge to approve staff' s recommendation . Under discussion , Vice Chainnan Stanbridge thought this revision should be brought back to the Historic Resources Advisory Committee . She also wanted to clarify that the report given by the developer had some very glaring errors in it . The time frame referred to as a " delay " was not on the part of the HRAC or the County . The information was not furnished on a timely basis to make the necessary decisions . She mentioned as an example , that at the first meeting it was discovered that there was a crossroad on Jungle Trail that was a traffic hazard . Public Works Director James W . Davis spent a number of months working with the developer on correcting that . Chairman Ginn asked if Vice Chairman Stanbridge wanted the matter sent back to the HRAC . Vice Chairman Stanbridge had questions concerning the micro - siting of the project which is better than the first plan which clear cut 70 feet of the County ' s right- of-way . That plan also had two sidewalks and other strange things on an historical road that was never wider than 12 or 18 feet . She understood it was necessary to comply with code , but this was extreme . If the committee members could see this revised plan , perhaps they could live with it . She did not want to cause unnecessary delay , but she had indicated from the very beginning that special meetings could be called and that offer is still open . She hoped the Commissioners would understand that she and the HRAC members worked very faithfully to bring about a project that everyone could be proud of and also preserve our heritage . She advised that she would like to have it referred back to the HRAC . January 23 , 2001 70 1 � B 5 6 � � ` ! _ 777 77 a y9 S t } r E N 3 •1 t s t