Laserfiche WebLink
. .F . . ..,'' . . i4... . ' . .:: ✓ *: , d z :: L Hca,�- `er' :a. :x 5 ' 'r .i .s.� 5 r ,r:,..dt <br /> : Kyx a:.` :§"r hr , v i 5 '': n .0 .r. xt: a <br /> Commissioner Adams WITHDREW her motion -, Vice Chairman <br /> Stanbridge WITHDREW her second . <br /> MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , <br /> SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , to refer this matter to <br /> the Historic Resources Advisory Committee . <br /> Commissioner Macht asked what Vice Chairman Stanbridge expected the HRAC to <br /> do , and Chairman Ginn and Vice Chairman Stanbridge stated the committee would review <br /> this plan and return a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners . <br /> Philippe Jacques , attorney representing CRC Development Company , spoke of the <br /> process that had occurred in this matter . He advised that the developer had no agenda on <br /> designing the road other than whatever the County wanted . He detailed how the road design <br /> process was begun in April and had proceeded . He advised that the design was not <br /> something the developer was trying to dictate nor argue , but has agreeably responded to <br /> whatever the County wanted . They are frustrated with this process because they are trying <br /> to comply with a County ordinance that has no criteria as to how an historical road should <br /> look . He advised of all the specific changes they had made to the plan based on either staff' s <br /> recommendation or the HRAC members ' comments . All of those resulted in the plan <br /> presented at this meeting . They were now nine months into the process and this small <br /> portion of the road seems to be a problem because the developer is trying to meet unstated <br /> criteria . They are concerned that a further delay would send the wrong message to the <br /> community . Someone trying to comply with an historical designation will be in for a very <br /> long and difficult process without any hard set criteria . Now the motion is to send it back <br /> yet again to the HRAC for another review , which might lead to a fourth redesign on a road <br /> January 23 , 2001 <br /> 71 <br /> BE . PG857 <br /> x777r e _ <br /> l r <br /> •. ,* - rx T „ e iyo .f <br /> .., <br />