Laserfiche WebLink
need not come back to the Board . <br /> Director Keating advised that the developer would lose about 7 or 8 lots in order to <br /> abide by the requirement of the motion . <br /> Chairman Ginn could not support the motion because the plan does not conserve any <br /> natural features ; she thought it should be developed without special exceptions . <br /> THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br /> carried 4 - 1 ( Chairman Ginn opposed ) . <br /> HaG . le FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) <br /> LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR <br /> ROSELAND ROAD SIDEWALK — PROJECT 9916 <br /> The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 31, 2001 : <br /> TO : James Chandler, County Administrator ^` <br /> THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E . , Public Works Direct_o:;: ✓ <br /> AND <br /> Christopher J . Kafer, Jr. , P . E . , County Enginee>[' <br /> FROM : Robert S . Skok, Civil Engineer e <br /> SUBJECT : FDOT Supplemental Agreement for Roseland Road Sidewalk - IRC Project <br /> No . 9916 <br /> DATE : January 3 , 2001 <br /> DESCRIPTION ANIS CONDITIONS <br /> Staff is following guidelines from the FDOT Local Agency Program for funding of concrete <br /> sidewalks . Staff has obtained a chance for obtaining S23 . 000 . 00 of increased funding for the <br /> Roseland Road Sidewalk project . Our current approved funding is for 5229 , 000 . 00 . The new total <br /> will be $ 252 , 000 . 00. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> In October 1999 , the FDOT and Indian River County entered into an agreement for 5229 , 000 . 00 <br /> funding to be provided by the FDOT to Indian River County for reimbursement after the County <br /> January 9 , 2001 <br /> 41 <br />