My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/2001 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
11/13/2001 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 3:49:33 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:31:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
11/13/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2549
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
One PD project which was recently approved, the Oaks of Vero, that has an L-2 land use <br />designation, is zoned RS -3, and is adjacent to property developed as RS -2 and RS -3. That <br />Project site contains 70.40 acres and is located at the northeast corner of 12`h Street and 58`' <br />Avenue/Lateral B Canal_ The Oaks of Vero was approved at a density of 2.32 unitsiacre, <br />with 9,100 square foot lots internal to the subdivision with 20' front yard setbacks, 7.5' side <br />yard setbacks,25' rear yard setbacks, and 70' lot widths. The lots along the south and west <br />Perimeter were approved at 10,500 square feet, with 20' front yard setbacks, 10' side yard <br />setbacks, 30' rear yard setbacks and 70' width. The north and east perimeter lots were <br />approved at 12,000 square feet with 80' of lot width and a 20' front yard setback. The right- <br />of-way was reduced from 50' to 40'. In the proposed design of Kenwood Village, the <br />applicant has chosen not to provide larger lots on the perimeter, but instead to provide a <br />transitional area. Therefore, there is a precedent for granting PD approval for a project <br />similar to Kenwood Village. <br />The requested waivers are summarized and compared in the table below <br />RS -3 Minimum Standard Proposed Kenwood Village <br />Minimum Standard <br />Lot Size 12,000 sq. ft. 9,100 sq. ft. <br />Lot Width 80 ft. 70 ft. <br />Lot Width 90 ft. 75 ft. <br />(comer lots) <br />Front yard Setback 25 ft. 20 ft. <br />Sideyard Setback 15 ft. 8 ft./10 ft. * (minimum 20' <br />cumulative side yard setback <br />per lot.) <br />Rear yard Setback 25 ft. 25 ft. * (20 ft. "no build" <br />zone on perimeter.) <br />Right -of --Way 50 ft. curb and gutter 40 ft. curb and gutter <br />*Note 1: The applicant is proposing a standard side yard setback of 10', which can be reduced to <br />8' in order to save trees. When the side yard setback is reduced to 8', the side yard on the opposite <br />side of the house will be expanded a corresponding amount (i.e. to 12') to keep a minimum of 20' <br />of side yard setback for the individual lot. This allows the footprint of the home to be shifted, but <br />not a larger footprint than evenly applied 10' side yard setbacks. This provision will allow homes <br />to be within 16' of one another, if both homes are shifted toward the common side lot line. <br />`Note 2: Where lots are adjacent to the project perimeters, there will be a 20' wide no build zone <br />or 70' conservation tract with an additional 5' setback for the principal structure to create a minimum <br />25' setback from the project perimeter for the principal structure. Pools, deck and screen enclosures <br />would be allowed in the 5' setback, but not to encroach in the 20' no build zone that provides space <br />for the Type `B" buffer, or the 70' conservation tract. There will be a 35' no build zone on the <br />recreation tract. These no build zones will be depicted on the final plat. <br />Note 3' The applicant is proposing a 40' wide right-of-way with 10' utility and drainage easements <br />on either side of the right-of-way which will form a 60' road and utility corridor and act like a <br />conventional 60' wide local road right-of-way. This arrangement allows for all necessary <br />infrastructure improvements and has been approved in other PD projects. <br />November 13, 2001 <br />62 <br />ell <br />1`1t ^ � <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.