My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/2001 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
11/13/2001 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 3:49:33 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:31:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
11/13/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2549
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11, 1Z 1 P ¢ rv9 <br />r <br />t' <br />t< <br />In addition, the staff asked the applicant to provide a letter indicating the public benefits of <br />the project, and justify the benefits. That letter is attachment ;:5 to the staff report. <br />Essentially, the developer has indicated that the PD design yields an economically feasible <br />number of lots, and allows use of large centralized stormwater tracts. By using such tracts, <br />instead of swales on lots, the grade through the development can be kept close to natural, <br />providing for a number of tree preservation opportunities. Also, the PD design allows <br />creation of off -lot preservation area and common green spaces. <br />j In conclusion, the proposed Kenwood Village PD has aspects which are similar to the <br />[ previously approved Oaks of Vero PD, in terms of its proximity to other developed property <br />and zoning districts, the scope of the waivers requested and tree preservation special <br />measures proposed. The project includes benefits such as 'Increased common open space <br />and recreation area, pedestrian inter -connections, internal pedestrian system, and special <br />provisions for preserving trees on-site. In addition, the project proposes a density less than <br />that of a conventional subdivision and has a design which is better than what could be <br />allowed through the conventional subdivision process. <br />RECOMMENDATION• <br />Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant PD <br />special exception use approval for "Kenwood Village with the following conditions: <br />1. That Caribbean fruit fly host plants are prohibited within the project area. <br />2. That prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the developer shall: <br />a. Obtain release of the Murphy Act Easement, and <br />b. Pay to the county the fee -in -lieu of preservation funds necessary to meet the <br />county upland set-aside requirement, and <br />C. Obtain planning division approval of detailed, final landscape plans for the <br />proposed buffers, common areas, and recreation/park tracts. <br />3. That prior to or via the final plat, the developer shall: <br />a. Dedicate the depicted upland conservation easement, and <br />b. Install or bond out the depicted and approved perimeter buffer(s), and <br />C. Place a restriction on the property that prohibits the planting of Caribbean <br />fruit fly host plants_ <br />d. Depict the 20' no build zone for the perimeter lots and 35' no build zone for <br />the recreation tract on the final plat. <br />4. That prior to issuance of a certificate of completion, the applicant shall construct the <br />left turn lane on 5"' Street S.W. <br />5. That the applicant shall have the homes micro -sited on the lots mentioned in the tree <br />preservation section of the staff report, and the building footprints shall be restricted <br />as depict on the approved preliminary plat. <br />November 13, 2001 <br />64 <br />L <br />D1K 1 r.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.