Laserfiche WebLink
asserted the new Commissioners' concerns should have been heard at the first meeting they <br />attended and that the issues they raised at the meeting of November 19, 2002 need to be <br />taken care of as soon as possible, not delayed for six months. Last week's meeting went <br />more smoothly and if this was fence -mending then the many proposed projects will be <br />accomplished and the residents of Indian River County will be benefitted. <br />9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRED MENSING RE <br />LAWSUIT - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY vs MENSING <br />Acting Chairman Macht cautioned that it is inappropriate for the Commissioners to <br />discuss this issue due to a pending lawsuit. <br />Fred Mensing advised he was present to inform the new Commissioners of pending <br />litigation and requested a closed door meeting be set up with him, the Commissioners, and <br />the respective attorneys to work toward a settlement of the entire matter. <br />County Attorney Paul Bangel advised that such a meeting is prohibited by the <br />Sunshine Law. He advised that he had briefed each of the new Commissioners and <br />corrected the hourly rate for outside counsel that Mr. Mensmg had mentioned. He will <br />contact the Board's outside counsel with regard to setting up a meeting with Mr. Mensing. <br />9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED <br />FOR DECEMBER 17, 2002 (a) COUNTY -INITIATED REQUEST TO <br />UPDATE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND TRANSPORTATION <br />ELEMENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Legislative); (b) <br />FRANK CATALA'S REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF THE <br />PORTION OF 78TH COURT BETWEEN 133RD PLACE AND 134TH <br />STREET (Legislative); <br />•. a <br />• <br />• <br />'0 <br />1 <br />1 <br />. <br />December 10, 2002 <br />-8- <br />a <br />80 <br />1 , <br />r <br />1 <br />(di <br />December 10, 2002 <br />-8- <br />a <br />80 <br />