Laserfiche WebLink
to move forward to solve this issue; they cannot solve them all at one time. The Board was <br />certain the tower issue was over, but it has again come back. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge felt the school on N5 Avenue had opened up the whole <br />Discussion ensued about sending Alternative I through the Comp Plan arr endmem <br />process so it can be forwarded to DCA during the January window. It was mentioned that <br />during that process there would be two public hearings and it would also go to P2,C. <br />Chairman Adorns explained that in the Comp Plan amendment pro�:ess, the <br />amendment would be subject to two public hearings and a review by the PZC and the <br />"January window" means it would be transmitted to DCA sometime in April or May. <br />Alternative 1 could be put through this process and would be subject to amendment, but <br />putting both Alternative I and 2 through the process was not possible, it had to be 1 or 2. <br />With that understanding, Vice Chairman Ginn agreed that she could stil-part the <br />motion. <br />The motion was restated by Chairman Adams that Mr. O'Haire's Alternati��e 1 will <br />be sent through the Comp Plan amendment process in January. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />10. GUN RANGE - STAFFING AND BUDGET <br />AMENDMENT 043 <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 6, 2000: <br />December 12, 20{}0 <br />- BU:DGET <br />