My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/18/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
12/18/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2020 4:58:30 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:33:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
12/18/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2551
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Background <br />The O'Haires own property at 575 Highway AIA. When the O'Haires first purchased the property <br />(parcel 16-33-40-0000-0030-00019.2), the O'Haires did not have waterfront access to the Indian River <br />Lagoon (i.e., did not have riparian rights). In order to achieve waterfront access, the O'Haires purchased <br />an additional 104 ± feet from the property owner to the west (Michael O'Haire, parcel 16-33-40-0000- <br />0030-00019.0) and a 63 ± foot section (out of a total of 81 ± feet) of a parcel known as Block A of River <br />Ridge Estates subdivision. Block A has riparian shoreline along its entire length. The O'Haires' riparian <br />frontage is along an irregular shoreline known as Martin Cove (see Attachment 1). <br />6 ' <br />As defined, a riparian line is a line on a waterfront parcel extending from the upland side property line, <br />where it meets the waters edge, out into the water. The area between a parcel's two riparian Lines is <br />generally referred to as the `riparian shoreline' or `riparian area' and is where the `riparian rights' of the <br />upland property owner exist. Typically, County staff rely on a certified survey of the riparian line <br />E provided by a qualified surveyor on behalf of the applicant or, in straightforward cases, a drawing <br />supplied by the owner/agent showing the riparian lines. Notwithstanding, legal establishment of a <br />riparian line under dispute can occur in one of only two ways: 1) the two individual property owners who <br />are affected can agree on where the line is, or 2) the riparian line can be established by a Circuit Court <br />Judge. <br />Sections 932.07 (2) and 932.07(4) of the County's Land Development Regulations require that docks, <br />piers, boat slips, boats, or other waterfront structures be setback from the riparian line a distance <br />determined by the side yard setback applicable to the zoning district in which the project is located (see <br />Attachment 2). Mr. and Mrs. O'Haire's property is in Zoning District RS -3 which has a required 15 foot <br />' side yard setback; therefore, the dock, pier, boat slip, and vessel(s) moored at the dock cannot encroach <br />s,- <br />into the 15 foot side yard setback as established by the riparian lines. <br />On a straight shoreline, the location of riparian lines can be straightforward (e.g., the riparian lines can <br />generally go straight out from the shoreline); however, in this particular case, the shoreline is actually a <br />small cove within a larger cove. Location of the riparian lines then becomes more complex and difficult. <br />I Riparian lines can crossover one another and in some cases an individual upland property may end up <br />with little or no nparian access if care is not taken when determining the location of the riparian lines. <br />In this case, Mr. George Collins, the neighbor immediately to the north of the O'Haire's property, has <br />concerns regarding the County issuance of a building permit for a dock on the O'Haire property. As <br />previously indicated, he disputes the location of the riparian line as determined by surveyors for the <br />O'Haires. Mr. Collins's position is that a county building permit for the dock cannot be issued until the <br />riparian line dispute is resolved in Circuit Court. As a result, Mr. Collins appealed County staff's <br />decision to issue a dock building permit to the O'Haires. On September 27, 2001, the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission heard Mr. Collins's appeal and voted 5-1 to uphold the appeal, thus delaying County <br />issuance of a permit until the Circuit Court rules on the riparian line. Mr. O'Haire is now appealing the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission's decision. <br />Attachment 3 is a chronology of events related to this appeal. <br />Planning and Zoninqy Commission (PZC) Action <br />On September 27, 2001, the PZC heard Mr. Collins's appeal. Mr. Collins gave to the PZC a packet of <br />additional information, a copy of which is on file in the Commission office. At that hearing, the PZC <br />voted 5 to 1 to modify staff s position to issue the County building permit (see Attachment 4). This <br />modification was: <br />to delay the decision to issue the permit (subject to conditions of removal if court determines <br />the riparian lines to be elsewhere), until the Circuit Court makes a determination on the <br />location of the riparian lines and any DEP exemptions or permits are in hand. <br />This action consequently overturned county staffs decision that a County building permit could be <br />immediately issued. <br />DECEMBER 18, 2001 <br />-75- <br />ni s t� r4, r, <br />D11 NUI- JJrJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.