Laserfiche WebLink
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 21, 2001: <br />TO: James E. Chandler, <br />County Administrator <br />FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., <br />Public Works Director <br />SUBJECT: Request from Ken <br />Assessment for <br />(9th Street SW) <br />Chestnut for County to Initiate Forced <br />Pavinq 12th Avenue SW between Oslo Road <br />and 8th Street SW <br />REF. LETTER: Attorney Bruce Barkett <br />2001 <br />to <br />James Davis dated Nov. 14, <br />DATE: November 21, 2001 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />Mr. Ken Chestnut owns three lots (7, 8, & 9 of Block A) in the <br />commercial/industrial section of Oslo Park Subdivision along 12th <br />Avenue SW. He has applied for approval to construct a 4,000 s.f. <br />commercial/industrial building on the lots. 12th Avenue SW is <br />unpaved and the traffic count on the road is over 200 vehicles per <br />day. Section 952.09 (5)(c)5 (Traffic Section) of the County Land <br />Development Regulations state that "No certificate of occupancy or <br />certificate of completion shall be issued for any project proposing <br />access from an unpaved road, including a Thoroughfare Plan road, <br />where the subject access road's volume with the project traffic <br />will exceed 200 average daily trips, until the road accessing the <br />project is paved from the project's access point(s) to a paved <br />public road." The code further states that " In considering the <br />cumulative effect of small traffic attracting/generating project(s) <br />on a road (s) or on an area, the Board of County Commissioners may <br />determine the need for a forced petition or assessment for road <br />paving purposes in developed or developing areas, and may impose <br />such an assessment." <br />Mr. Chestnut is willing to pay his "fair share" of paving the 660 <br />l.f. of 12th Avenue SW, but since other commercial retail sales and <br />industrial businesses are between his lots and Oslo Road, he is <br />requesting, <br />througn his <br />att( <br />that benefit <br />from <br />the <br />paving <br />other property <br />Barkett is requesting <br />also <br />the <br />Cc <br />project. The <br />cost <br />to <br />to initiate <br />pave <br />Since approximately <br />1100 <br />road is approximately <br />1. <br />owners assessment <br />would <br />frontage <br />be <br />would be $15,000. <br />$41/front foot, <br />and the County <br />share <br />DECEMBER 4, 2001 <br />-105- <br />;'t4? <br />)rney, <br />that the <br />other property <br />owners <br />also <br />pay their <br />fair share. <br />Attorney <br />)unty <br />to initiate <br />a forced assessment <br />the <br />road is approximately <br />$60,000. <br />f. of <br />frontage <br />exists, the <br />property <br />$41/front foot, <br />and the County <br />share <br />-105- <br />;'t4? <br />