My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/13/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
2/13/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2020 4:21:22 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:12:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
02/13/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2275
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Yr <br />DATE: January 11, 2001 <br />SUBJECT: The Oaks of Vero, Inc.'s Request for Planned Development (PD) Conceptual <br />Plan and Special Exception Use Approval for a 163 Lot Single -Family <br />Subdivision to be Known as The Oaks of Vero <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 13, 2001 <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />On behalf of the Oaks of Vero Inc., Schulke. Bittle and Stoddard LLC has submitted an application <br />for special exception use/conceptual PD plan approval for a 163 lot single-family development on <br />70.40 acres located at the northeast corner of 58t Avenue and 12`h Street. The subject property is <br />an existing grove and is zoned RS -3, a zoning district which allows single-family development at <br />a density of up to 3 units/acre. The west 35.7 acres of this site were the subject of the <br />Brookfield/Soverel PD rezoning request which was denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />at its regular meeting of March 23, 2000. <br />• Planning and Zoning Commission Action: <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this application at its regular meeting of <br />January 11, 2001 and voted 6 to 1 to recommend approval with the following conditions: <br />1. That there be a 70 -foot minimum lot width on interior lots (increased from 60'). <br />'_. That there be a Type "B" buffer around the entire project except on 12th Street. where <br />a Type "C' buffer (increased from Type 'D" on the west and a Type "C' on the north <br />and east) will be allowed. <br />That the PD design take into consideration preservation of certain trees in the <br />vicinity of neighboring properties, specifically the large pecan tree near Mr. Roth's <br />property and the large tree on Talmage Rogers' grove, and that such design locate <br />and help preserve both trees. <br />4. That the existing grove included in the Phase II area be allowed to be continued <br />during development of Phase I and that required perimeter buffering be allowed to <br />be installed in the project's respective phases (Phase I and Phase II). <br />After the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant submitted a revised PD design <br />that eliminates the 60' wide lots and meets the 70' lot width condition of the Planning and Zoning <br />Cotnmission recommendations. The revised PD plan also incorporates the other recommended <br />conditions, except for the condition that a Type "B" buffer be provided along the west (58th <br />Avenue) property line. Staffs analysis contained in this report is based on the modified design and <br />applies all of the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommended conditions, including provision <br />of a Type "B" buffer on the project's west perimeter. Thus, the post Planning and Zoning <br />Commission meeting design is the current proposal now under consideration. <br />February 13, 2001 <br />BK 1 1 7 PG 0 6 8 <br />56 <br />nr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.