My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/5/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
2/5/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:13:51 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:35:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
02/05/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2554
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DATE: January 21. 2002 <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />Helmet House Construction Corp. has submitted a building permit application for a single family <br />residence on the subject properly and has requested a waiver of the cut and fill balance requirement <br />of Section 930.07(2)(d) of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance. The site is <br />located in an AE special flood hazard zone, base flood elevation 6.0 ft N.G.V.D. The ten year flood <br />elevation is 3.0 feet N.G.V.D. The proposed displacement of the floodplain below 4.0 feet for which <br />the waiver is requested is 560 cubic yards as indicated in the attached letter from the applicant's <br />engineer dated January 9, 2002. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The project meets the cut and till balance waiver criteria proposed in Section 930.07(2)(d)1. of being <br />situated in an estuarine environment within the 100 year floodplain along the Indian River and in <br />staffs opinion it appears that all other Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance <br />requirements can be met without adverse impact on other lands in the estuarine environment. The <br />applicant has not submitted an alternative grading plan that satisfied the cut and fill balance <br />requirement without needing the waiver. The applicant is requesting the waiver so he will not be <br />required to construct an on site retention area if the waiver is granted. <br />Alternative No. 1 <br />Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)1. <br />Alternative No. 2 <br />Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to compensate for the <br />proposed floodplain displacement. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board <br />unanimously granted the cut and fill balance waiver <br />based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)1, as <br />recommended by staff <br />FEBRUARY 5, 2002 <br />-24- <br />!t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.