My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/11/2003
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
3/11/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 12:33:41 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:51:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/11/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2567
Book and Page
125, 081-120
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sand is gone. He agreed that different beaches respond differently to sand pumping. But <br />to say that sand will be on our beaches for 5 years is overdoing it. He stij 1 believed our <br />beaches are not eroding as badly as people think they are. He closed by saying; he would like <br />to be on the Beach Advisory Committee. <br />Frank Coffey, 1200 Admirals Walk, advised he is President of the Taxpayers <br />Association and was speaking for the Board of Directors. They are pleased this hearing was <br />scheduled and commented the process is not so different from the annual budget hearings. <br />They recently reviewed the entire material regarding the capital projects for the first 5 years. <br />The Board of Directors established 4 categories for these projects. Under their first category <br />(endorsement) they endorsed the new Administration Building but were concerned there <br />may not be sufficient funds to finish it. They endorsed but questioned the need for <br />replacement of the Courthouse chillers so soon. They endorsed but looked for justification <br />for the Parks Maintenance Facility and the Public Works Facility projects. They endorsed <br />road improvements but wanted to see a priority list established. They also endorsed the jail <br />expansion, but wanted an explanation to justify the need. They endorsed stormwater <br />projects but a priority listing should be established. They endorsed the Landfill project in <br />south Gifford, but questioned if there might be Federal assistance available. They endorsed <br />the fiber network expansion but wanted to know more specifics on what areas will be <br />included. They endorsed the Courthouse phone system and looked for data to eupport such <br />a need. They supported the reserve for contingency but wanted to know hove, the amount <br />was determined. Under their second category, they asked for adequate infohmation and <br />justification concerning Jaycee, Conn, and Humiston Beach restorations, Emergency <br />Service's Stations #12 and #13 expenditures, 800 MHZ radio station, branch library costs, <br />and West Regional Park. Their third category is projects they do not support: a pool <br />complex at South County Park because there are other pools available. They also felt that <br />March 11, 2003 <br />21 <br />LO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.