My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/16/2005
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
03/16/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2022 12:43:25 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:54:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Joint Meeting - Traffic Impact Fee Rate
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/16/2005
Archived Roll/Disk#
3001
Book and Page
128, 535-547
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that was not part of the study. He clarified that the net difference is about $5,000 on a single <br />family home and less than that on other land uses based on the per 1,000 square feet. <br />Councilman Richard Dunlop, Town of Orchid, recommended two changes to the <br />interlocal agreement, 1) include language referring to an error made by the city on impact fees <br />whereby the city can receive back the administrative fee, and 2) to add a paragraph that obligates <br />the County to give each of the municipalities a computer program that will do all the accounting <br />for them and let them electronically submit and transfer all their data every month as they submit <br />their wire transfers. Mr. Wallace agreed and said their goal is to bring everyone together and <br />provide that to them. <br />Councilman Dunlop said after going through all the numbers he disagreed with the <br />methodology used for the libraries and wanted to know why they showed it as a shortfall. Mr. <br />Wallace said theoretically it should show a gap because there are other revenue sources that <br />should bring it close to equaling the total. He said it will not be exact because they may decide <br />to change those revenue sources in the future and that is the purpose of looking at impact fees <br />every 3-5 years to fund capital expansion. <br />Commissioner Wheeler inquired if fast foods, 7 -Eleven and convenience stores are <br />combined. Mr. Wallace informed him that there is a specific category that allows them to <br />collect impact fees combined. It covers fast food, convenience and car washes combined. <br />Commissioner Wheeler assumed when a building burns down there would not be <br />additional impact fees to rebuild and Mr. Wallace responded affirmatively. <br />Dr. McGarvey asked Superintendent Maher and Assistant Superintendent of Business <br />and Finance Ms. Robinson to attend this workshop with him. He stated they might not reach a <br />consensus today due to the nature of their concerns. Dr. McGarvey disagreed on the <br />methodology of using historical data instead of current land costs. He begged the municipalities <br />and the Board to have the land cost in the study reconsidered. Mr. Wallace explained they used <br />the data available at the time, however, the report can be updated. <br />Discussion continued regarding the costs of donated sites for schools by developers and <br />that was not factored into the report. Mr. Wallace informed the School Board they will need to <br />MARCH 16, 2005 6 <br />JOINT MEETING - IMPACT FEE STUDY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.