My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/19/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
3/19/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:07:56 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:37:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
03/19/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2555
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />555 -5- <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 19, 2002. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />This is a request by Indeco, Inc. to amend Figure 4.13 of the Transportation Element of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. That figure is the Future Roadway Functional Classification Map, also known <br />as the Thoroughfare Plan Map. Figure 4.13 identifies 25th Street, SW as a Rural Major Collector <br />Roadway from 43rd Avenue east to 12th Avenue. The request is to remove the portion of 25`h Street, <br />SW located between 20`h Avenue and 27`h Avenue (also known as Emerson Avenue and CR 607). <br />Attachment 2 shows the Proposed Figure 4.13. <br />PAST ACTIONS <br />On September 27, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the <br />Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed comprehensive plan text amendment. <br />On November 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners voted 5 to 0 to transmit the proposed <br />comprehensive plan text amendment request to the Florida Department of Community Affairs <br />(DCA) for its review. <br />ORC REPORT <br />Consisted with state regulations, DCA reviewed the proposed amendment and prepared an <br />Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report (dated February 1, 2002), which <br />planning staff received on February 4, 2002. The DCA ORC Report, Attachment 5 at the end of this <br />staff report, does not contain any objections or comments relating to the proposed amendment. <br />BACKGROUND <br />For 25th Street, SW, no right-of-way currently exists between 20th Avenue and 27`h Avenue. East of <br />20th Avenue and west of 27`h Avenue, 25th Street, SW exists as part of platted subdivisions and <br />functions like a small local road. Currently, the county does not have any plans to extend 25th Street <br />SW to connect 20`h Avenue and 27th Avenue. <br />The issue of removing a portion of 25`h Street, SW from the Thoroughfare Plan Map is related to the <br />proposed Falcon Trace residential development. According to a Preliminary Plat application <br />submitted by the applicant, Falcon Trace is proposed to be a 290 acre development that ‘1,i11 consist <br />of 327 single-family units and an 18 hole golf course. The entire project is generally located <br />between 20`h Avenue and 27`h Avenue; and between 17th Street, SW and 25th Street, SW <br />Despite the fact that several factors (including the existing development patterns and the lack of <br />existing right-of-way) indicate that the subject portion of 25`h Street, SW will never be built, the <br />applicant has submitted this request for two reasons. The first reason is to retain the land that would <br />be reserved for public road right-of-way if the subject portion of 25th Street, SW remained a <br />Thoroughfare Plan Map roadway. <br />The second reason that the applicant has proposed deleting the subject portion of25`h Street, SW is <br />related to compatibility issues between major roads and residential developments. While the county <br />has many residential developments along major roads, those developments usually provide <br />substantial setbacks and buffers to mitigate the noise, lights and odors associated with major roads. <br />By removing the road from the comprehensive plan, the applicant reduces the chances that the road <br />will ever be built and that impacts associated with the road will need to be mitigated. <br />March 19, 2002 <br />49 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.