My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/5/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
3/5/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:04:23 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:36:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
03/05/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2554
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into <br />the urban service area through zoning and LDRs. Since the proposed rezoning would allow and <br />encourage more development on the subject property, and the subject property is within the urban <br />service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2. <br />Future Land Use Element Objective 4 <br />Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce the number and length of <br />trips on county roads. The site is located near several employment centers, including the Vero Beach <br />Municipal Airport, Dodgertown, and the SR 60/58th Avenue commercial/industrial node. That node <br />is one of the county's largest employment centers. Most people who work in that node live in <br />moderately -priced, low to medium density housing. The RM -6 zoning district is intended for such <br />housing. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase the opportunity for people who work in that <br />node to live near their job, thus reducing the length of their tnps to and from work. For this reason, <br />the request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 4. <br />Trans <br />1 <br />ortation Element Ob'ective 11 and Polic 11.1 <br />Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policy 11.1 state that the county will increase densities in <br />the urbanized area and along major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass transit <br />provision. Since the proposed rezoning will increase the allowed density along and near several <br />major transportation corridors this request implements Transportation Element Objective 11 and <br />Policy 11.1 <br />Consistency Summary <br />As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all the objectives and <br />policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, staff's position is that the request is consistent <br />with the comprehensive plan. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />Staff's position is that the requested zoning districts are appropriate for the site and that development <br />under those zoning districts would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Because land directly <br />east of the northern parcel of the subject property, on the east side of 66`h Avenue, is zoned RS -3, <br />the request is for a continuation of an existing single-family residential zoning pattern. <br />The proposal is also for a continuation of an existing multiple -family residential zoning pattem along <br />26`h Street. That is because the request is also to rezone the southern parcel of the subject property <br />to RM -6. In fact, multiple -family and mobile home zoning and development are already prominent <br />along both sides of 26`h Street, west of 58th Avenue. <br />Consistent with the comprehensive plan, the proposed rezoning implements an incremental transition <br />in zoning districts and the land use intensity of theirpenuitted uses This transition is accomplished <br />by placing multiple -family districts between single-family districts and commercial/industrial <br />districts or major roads. <br />Located near the SR 60/58`h Avenue commercial/industrial node (which includes the Indian River <br />Mall), the southern parcel of the subject property is particularly well suited to meet the demand for <br />multiple -family housing generated by development within that node. In effect, the proposed <br />rezoning would increase the opportunity for people to live near their place of employment. <br />March 5, 2002 <br />72 <br />'.373 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.