Laserfiche WebLink
plant something else . " <br /> Commissioner Adams stressed that was the Board ' s point and that is why what the <br /> Hurleys want to do is a special exception . Her biggest concern was that they bypassed the <br /> TRC , failed to get their input , and came directly to the Board . They had the opportunity, but <br /> they chose not to do it and flagrantly disregarded that process and jump started to PZC and <br /> the Board . <br /> Mr. Evans advised that they did go to TRC and staff found 3 objections . He <br /> reiterated that staff had said nothing about compatibility ; the issues were clustering, <br /> recreational percentage , and giving up right- of-way for roadway . He then addressed their <br /> reasons for not going back to TRC to address those 3 objections . His client was being <br /> criticized for choosing to do what is allowed by the law . <br /> Chairman Ginn could not support the request because of two concerns : 1 ) the Comp <br /> Plan calls for the preservation of agricultural lands and no net loss of agricultural lands , 2 ) <br /> and the master plan for utilities provides for water only in the urban service area to the year <br /> 2020 . <br /> It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the <br /> public hearing . <br /> MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge ; <br /> SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , to deny the application <br /> as submitted . <br /> Under discussion , Commissioner Macht asked staff if any kind of development in the <br /> agricultural district had to have an association with agriculture . It appeared to him that the <br /> application was for a residential- recreational community with no agricultural aspect . <br /> April 17 , 2001 <br /> 38 <br /> K 11 17 PG 03 2 6 <br />