Laserfiche WebLink
c. Construction. <br />New antenna -supporting structures shall have a monopole <br />type construction only, and shall not be guyed or have a <br />lattice type construction. <br />d. Structural Integrity. <br />1. The entire antenna -supporting structure and all <br />appurtenances shall be designed pursuant to the wind <br />speed design requirements of ASCE 7-95, including <br />any subsequent modification to those specifications; <br />and applicable building code requirements; and <br />2. The new antenna -supporting structure shall be designed <br />to accommodate the maximum amount of wireless <br />communications equipment, including that of other <br />wireless communication service providers. The exact <br />amount of potential additional equipment to be <br />accommodated shall be agreed upon during a pre - <br />application conference and recorded in the Letter of <br />Understanding resulting from the conference In all <br />cases, the minimum number of collocated facilities on a <br />new antenna -supporting structure between 80 and 119 <br />feet tall shall be two (2), and for a structure between <br />120 and 150 feet tall shall be three (3). <br />Lighting. <br />New antenna -supporting structures shall be illuminated in <br />accordance with FAA requirements to provide aircraft <br />obstruction lighting, where required. Any such illumination <br />shall be by red lighting unless otherwise directed by the <br />FAA. Louvers or shields may be required by the county to <br />keep lighting from shining down on surrounding properties. <br />f. Colocation Feasibility. <br />1. No antenna -supporting structure shall be permitted <br />unless the applicant demonstrates that no existing <br />wireless communications facility can accommodate the <br />appfcant's proposed facility; or that use of such <br />exist'ng facilities would prohibit personal wireless <br />services in the area of the County to be served by the <br />proposed antenna -supporting structure. <br />2. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing <br />wireless communications facility could accommodate <br />the applicant's proposed facility may consist of any of <br />the following: <br />APRIL 2, 2002 <br />(i) No existing wireless communications facilities <br />located within the geographic area meet the <br />applicant's engineering requirements. <br />(ii) Existing wireless communications facilities are <br />not of sufficient height to meet the applicant's <br />engineering requirements. <br />