Laserfiche WebLink
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />On August 19, 1981, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a development order (D.O.) <br />approving the development of regional ( impact (DRI) at that time as Village Green West and <br />Village Green South p <br />That DRI approval allowed development of 1,448 mobile homes on 317.5 <br />acres of land located south of S.R. 60 and west of 82nd Avenue. Currently, the DRI project area <br />includes the Countryside and Vero Palms mobile home parks (see attachment #1 <br />In 1994, the D.O. <br />Owas amended to reduce the total number of residential units on the 317.5 acre site <br />to 1,283, said units to consist of 1,163 mobile homes and 120 single f <br />family homes were approved for a 46.55 acre portion of the overall Dr a project amity homes. The 120 single - <br />as "Sable Trace". That "Sable Trace" project was never developed, andte the vacant 46.55 ac eonown site <br />was sold to another developer Now, the current developer of that 46.55 acre site, Blue Water Realty <br />(LLC), is requesting a change to the D.O. to allow a mix of single-family <br />rather than single family homes only. No increase in the total number oftnits (120) foromes andbile the homes <br />46.55 <br />acre site is proposed. <br />Pursuant to FS 380.06, which governs DRIB, the county may determine that the request does not <br />constitute a substantial deviation to the approved DRI development <br />in staff's opinion, the request does not constitute a substantial devi tion If the Board oft Couthat, <br />nty <br />Commissioners determines that the proposed change does not constitute a substantial deviation, then <br />the request will be treated asa proposed change or "minor amendment". <br />a change in an approved D.O. can be made by the Board of CountyAs a minor amendment, <br />vote and recommendation from the Treasure Coast Reg Commissioners Council ( without a fozznal <br />Regional Planning Council (T.C.R.P.C.). <br />The Board is now to dete mine whether the request does or does not constitute a substantial <br />deviation. If the Board determines that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation, then <br />it can take action to approve or deny the amendment proposal. <br />.ANALYSIS: <br />The proposed change would result in 64 mobile homes on a 22.54 <br />(Residential Mobile Homes, up to 8 units/acre)and 56 singe homesacetract zoned acre tract <br />zoned RS -6 (Residential Single Family, up to 6 units/acre). The request conforms to current zoning <br />,i family on a 24.01 tract <br />boundaries and densities, and would result in the same number of units (120) already allowed on the <br />46.55 acre site The request also conforms to the preliminary approval <br />December 13, 2001. That approval was for the Bluewater Subdivision Phase 1, <br />granted which approved 56 <br />single family lots on the 24.01 acre RS -6 zoned portion of the 46.55 acre tract. As proposed, the <br />Phase 2 RNIH-s zoned 22.54 acre portion of the 46.55 acre tract will not be developed until site <br />plan <br />and subdivision approval are obtained in the future for 64 mobile home Lots. <br />• Determination: Not a Substantial Deviation Request <br />Both county and T.C.R.P.C. staff have concluded that the proposed change will not create <br />any additional impacts (see attachment #3), and that under FS 380.06 the request should not <br />be treated as a substantial deviation. Thus, the request should be considered to not constitute <br />a substantial deviation. <br />• <br />APRIL 2, 2002 <br />0SG <br />-77- <br />