My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/23/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
4/23/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:55:12 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:39:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
04/23/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2555
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Chairman read the above title into the record. <br />11.C.1. ENHANCED SECURITY FOR COURTHOUSE - SIEMENS <br />BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES <br />General Services Director Tom Frame reviewed a Memorandum of April 17, 2002: <br />Date: April 17, 2002 <br />To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners <br />Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator <br />From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director /ItiLccic,/ �' <br />Subject: Enhanced Security for Courthouse <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Following the attacks in New York on September 11, 2001, a task force was utilized by the Indian River <br />County Sheriff's Department relative to security enhancements for the Indian River County Courthouse. <br />A number of recommendations were generated for consideration. Foremost in those recommendations <br />was an enhancement to the closed circuit TV system. That enhanced system proposed 13 additional <br />cameras along with various controls and recorders. <br />Star Communications has quoted a price of $34,035 for the installation of this system with county staff to <br />provide camera installation labor. The labor work must be performed after hours or on weekends to <br />prevent disturbances in the courtrooms. 1 his would require overtime for the county employees. <br />We had attempted to obtain quotes from our current security provider in vain. Next we contacted <br />Siemens Building Technologies, which is the company utilized to provide and install detention controls in <br />the county jail. `Their quote is attached for your review. They submitted a quote that included the cost of <br />installation of wiring and cable, which is only $2,765 more than the quote from Star Communications. <br />By having Siemens Building Technologies install the equipment and wiring we eliminate a problem of <br />undetermined time to finished the wiring through scheduling difficulties, we eliminate overtime costs and <br />we obtain a system that is under warranty from camera to processor including wiring. <br />This is an unanticipated expense, which has been identified as a needed security enhancement for the <br />Courthouse. It was not budgeted accordingly and needs to be funded via the General Fund Contingency. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />That the Board waiver its fouual bid procedures and accept the proposal submitted by Siemens Building <br />Technologies for the installed quotation of $36,800, the funding be authorized from the General Fund <br />Contingency and that the Chairman be authorized to execute the Terns and Conditions of Sales <br />Acknowledgement upon the final approval of the acicnowledgement by the County Attorney's office. <br />April 23, 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.