My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/3/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
4/3/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 9:40:32 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:17:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
04/03/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2277
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Frank Coffey, 1335 River Ridge Drive, Vero Beach, read from his prepared remarks <br />and from selected paragraphs (pages 73, 74, and 75) from the unapproved minutes of the <br />Board of County Commissioners' meeting held February 13, 2001. (Clerk's note: Both Mr. <br />Coffey's handwritten remarks and minutes have been filed with the backup for the meeting.) <br />He believed that all taxpayers would like to receive quarterly reports on the status of the <br />County's projects such as the following: PEP reef, Beach Restoration, Roads and Bridges, <br />Closed Landfills, Gun Range, and North County Park. He had learned about an in-house <br />county document being utilized regarding the status of such projects, but in his opinion it <br />provided limited useful information and it was not current. He gave examples of information <br />on the Beach Restoration Project from the in-house report. He also recommended what <br />minimum detailed information should be on the report as follows: date, project engineer, <br />scope of work, expected benefits, date approved, approved by, estimated costs, source of <br />funds, anticipated completion date, expenditures to date, accomplishments previous quarter, <br />anticipated accomplishments in next quarter, and major issues unresolved. He urged the <br />Board to establish a budget oversight group of at least 10 taxpayers under the direction of <br />Assistant Administrator Baird as soon as possible with at least the following objectives: 1) <br />develop a status report format to be used to summarize the status of each significant project <br />on a quarterly basis; and 2) develop a proposed policy setting forth appropriate criteria for <br />reallocation of funds from one approved project to another. <br />In closing, Mr. Coffey acknowledged the presence of Press Journal Reporter Mike <br />Kaiser and wished him well in his new job in Stuart. <br />Administrator Chandler advised that he and Assistant Administrator Baird receive <br />project progress reports from staff on a regular basis as well as expense and revenue reports <br />and use them as tools. Subsequent to the meeting of February 13`h, they brought back the <br />status on the North County Pool project and the Shooting Range. They also bring items to <br />the Board when there are changes or anticipated changes in capital expenditures. <br />April 3, 2001 <br />BIi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.