My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/3/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
4/3/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 9:40:32 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:17:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
04/03/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2277
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware who sees this proposed development with an <br />architectural eye. He predicted the proposed height of the building will destroy the beauty <br />of A 1 A and the ambiance of the entire area. <br />Vince Bruno, 9480 Doubloon Drive, spoke against the height of the building <br />wondering whose home it would fall on should it fall over. He advised that there are <br />Simpson oaks dispersed throughout that property which are an endangered species. He <br />wondered if the developers have taken into consideration the erosion problem and if so they <br />planned to install steel bulkheads which are against Sea Turtle Survival League's <br />requirements. He asked if they are going to apply for an incidental take on turtles and if they <br />are aware that process could take 5 or 6 years. He thought "the ambiance of the area should <br />not be bothered or intruded with this monstrosity." He was certain there are other areas they <br />could build and let the people live their lives as they have for the last 30 years. <br />Ralph Evans, attorney for the developer, 3355 Ocean Drive, Vero Beach, wanted to <br />address concerns and if more are raised, he would like to have the opportunity to address <br />them as well. He asked Scott McGuire, the engineer on the project, to address some of the <br />issues raised not only by the appeal but by the Commissioners and the public in relation to <br />this property. This is the third attempt to develop this site and he was not familiar with the <br />first one. He advised of some of the particulars of a suit that went to court concerning the <br />Orchid Dunes overlay. <br />Scott McGuire, Knight McGuire & Associates, appeared on behalf of Atlas <br />Development Company. He explained how he had gone about addressing the issues and <br />concerns. Regarding access for emergency vehicles, he advised they had met with Fire <br />Prevention Plan Review/Inspection Bureau Chief Dan Dietz and Lt. Dennis Meliti who <br />reviewed the plan in great detail and the appropriate changes were made. The final design <br />does meet present fire codes and will also meet the new code and Chief Dietz was present <br />to address any questions. Concerning the density issue, the proposed use of the property is <br />April 3, 2001 <br />(I �� 7 5 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.